May 28, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 148

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 26, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 25, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

TCPAWORLD AFTERDARK: is this malpractice?

So… let’s talk about something unpleasant.

Followers of TCPAWorld know well that the standing rules in Florida state court just changed. Like.. massively. 

In fact, to have standing to sue for unwanted text messages in state court in Florida now you basically have to show that the conduct was “outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency…”

So basically its impossible to establish standing in an FTSA case. Which means  these cases are doomed to immediate dismissal.

Unless, of course, an FTSA Defendant were to do something UTTERLY ridiculous like remove a case OUT OF STATE COURT and into federal court where the standing rules are now less stringent–i.e. where the Plaintiff has a much better chance of keeping his case alive.

But who would ever do something like that?

Williams-Sonoma, Inc., apparently.

In Conneran v. Williams-Sonoma the Plaintiff alleges violation of the FTSA arising out of receipt of a telephonic sales call. Just one, apparently.

There is precisely a zero percent chance that claim would meet the Eldridge test. So all the Defendant had to do was move to dismiss and the case was dead. Like, forever.

But instead the case was sent to federal court where the W-S now has to defend the case on the merits.

I mean… what in the world guys?

Maybe I am missing something but this seems absolutely ludicrous to me. And I don’t throw the word “malpractice” around lightly.. or at all really. (In fact in the ~2000 articles I have written this is the first time I have ever suggested something of the sort…) But I don’t see why a Defendant would intentionally remove a dead case to federal court and essentially revive it.

If you understand how this makes sense please shoot me a note and I will update this article. I dont want to bury anybody wrongfully–so if there is an angle here let me know–but I am simply stumped.

Anyhoo before YOU remove an FTSA case to federal court PLEASE consider the new standing rules in play in state court after Edlridge.

And if you want to read the Sonoma removal papers they are here: Willians Sonoma Removal

Sleep tight TCPAWorld…

© 2023 Troutman FirmNational Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 146
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Eric Troutman TCPA Lawyer Troutman Law Firm Orange County, CA
Founder

Eric J Troutman is known as one of the country’s prominent class action defense lawyers and is nationally recognized in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation and compliance. He has served as lead defense counsel in more than 70 national TCPA class actions and has litigated nearly a thousand individual TCPA cases in his role as national strategic litigation counsel for major banks and finance companies. Eric also helps industry participants build TCPA-compliant processes, policies, and systems.

Eric's perspective allows him to...

949-350-3663