The Theological Roots Of Advice And Consent
Monday, May 20, 2019

The United States Constitution vests the executive power of the federal government in the president, but his or her power is not entirely autonomous.  Notably, Article II, Section 2 notably endows the president with the power to make treaties with the "advice and consent" of the Senate.  While the president has unilateral power to nominate ambassadors, judges and other officers of the United States, actual appointments may only be made with the "advice and consent" of the Senate.

The concept of advice and consent is an ancient one.  It may have begun with the Etruscans, a people who preceded the Romans on the Italian peninsula.  Like the Greeks and Romans, the Etruscans worshipped a pantheon of deities having one king or chief god.  For the Greeks, this was Ζεύς (Zeus), for the Romans in was Jupiter, and for the Etruscans it was Tinia.  Like his Greek and Roman counterparts, Tinia could hurl thunderbolts.  Unlike Zeus and Jupiter, however, Tinia was required to consult with, and obtain the consent of, the other principal gods before throwing a destructive thunderbolt.  

This idea of advice and consent became a central feature of the Roman government.  Unlike the United States Senate, the Roman senate was not a legislative body.  It was a deliberative body whose consent was required to legitimize executive and administrative actions.  This consultative role gave it indirect executive power.

The founding fathers of the American republic may not have been thinking of Tinia when they wrote the advice and consent requirement into the Constitution.  There can be no doubt, however, that they were familiar with, and borrowed from, precedents from the Roman republic that had their origins in Etruscan theology. 

 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins