June 26, 2022

Volume XII, Number 177

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Transfers from EEA Controller to EEA Processor: Controller (EEA)→ Processor (EEA) → Affiliated Processor (US) (Data Directly Sent from Controller to Processor in The Us)

The following is part of Greenberg Traurig’s ongoing series analyzing cross-border data transfers in light of the new Standard Contractual Clauses approved by the European Commission in June 2021.

Visual

Implications

  • Background. Company Z-1 and Company Z-2 are corporate affiliates who are under common ownership or control, but are separate legal entities. Data is being directly sent from Controller A in the EEA to Processor Z-2 in the United States. Company A has contracted only with Processor Z-1 in the EEA. The solid line indicates the data flow; dashed line indicates the contractual relationships.

  • The GDPR requires that an Article 28 data processing agreement (DPA) be completed between Company A and Company Z-1. Note that under the GDPR, Company Z-1 is not permitted to transfer information outside of the EEA without the authorization of Company A.1 If Company Z-1 intends to subcontract the processing of data (including the receipt of data from Company A), the DPA should at a minimum include a general authorization to transfer information outside of the EEA; it might also identify the specific country in which Company Z-2 is located (i.e., the US). In addition, the European Commission has defined the “data exporter” as being the “controller or processors transferring the personal data to a third country.”2 As Company A is physically transmitting personal data to Company Z-2 an argument could be made that Company A must enter into a cross-border transfer mechanism. This could arguably take one of two forms:

    • Option 1: SCC Module 2 CàP between Company A and Company Z-1 that permits Company Z-2 to “sign on” to the agreement through the optional Clause 7 docking clause (Option 2 in the diagram).

    • Option 2: SCC Module 2 CàP could be entered between Company A and Company Z-2.

  • Transfer Impact Assessments. Section 14 of the SCCs require that Company A, Company Z-1, and Company Z-2 document a transfer impact assessment of United States law to determine whether either party has reason to believe that the laws and practices of the United States that apply to the personal data transferred prevent Company Z-2 from fulfilling its obligations under the SCCs.

  • Law enforcement request policy. Section 15 of the SCCs require Company Z-2 to take specific steps in the event that it receives a request from a public authority for access to personal data. As a result, Company Z-2 might consider creating a law enforcemen1

FOOTNOTES

1 EDPB, Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR, Version 1.0, at paras. 116 and 117.

2 Commission Implementing Decision of 4.6.2021 at para. 3.

©2022 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 49
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

David A. Zetoony Privacy Attorney Greenberg Traurig
Shareholder

David Zetoony, Co-Chair of the firm's U.S. Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, focuses on helping businesses navigate data privacy and cyber security laws from a practical standpoint. David has helped hundreds of companies establish and maintain ongoing privacy and security programs, and he has defended corporate privacy and security practices in investigations initiated by the Federal Trade Commission, and other data privacy and security regulatory agencies around the world, as well as in class action litigation. 

David receives regular recognitions from clients and peers for...

303.685.7425
Carsten Kociok, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Germany, Cybersecurity and Technology, Finance Litigation Attorney
Counsel

Carsten Kociok focuses his practice on the technology, media and telecommunications industries. He has broad experience in the areas of Internet, information technology, electronic and mobile payments and new media, as well as regulatory and data protection law issues.

Carsten advises national and international companies from the Internet, payments and technology industries on the commercial and regulatory side of their business, in particular in the areas of e-commerce and e-business, electronic and mobile payments, service distribution,...

490-30700-171119
Andrea C. Maciejewski Data Privacy Lawyer Greenberg Traurig
Associate

Andrea C. Maciejewski advises clients on compliance with local and international data privacy regulations including the GDPR, CCPA, COPPA, CAN-SPAM , TCPA, and state biometric laws. She guides clients on data breach response and privacy policies.

 

+1 303.572.6500
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement