January 28, 2022

Volume XII, Number 28

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Is the Travel Ban Back On? Supreme Court to Decide Its Fate Next Term

On June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear the appeals over the president’s revised travel ban against certain foreign nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen during the first session of the Court’s October 2017 term. In issuing the opinion, the Supreme Court partially granted the government's request to reinstate the travel ban, but limited the scope through a “bona fide relationship” test. Specifically, the Court’s decision allows the travel ban to go into effect for the above-mentioned foreign nationals, but only if they lack any “bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”

Although the government has not yet issued guidance on the criteria for satisfying the bona fide relationship test, the Court did provide several examples of situations in which a sufficient relationship likely exists. These scenarios include: a foreign national who has “a close familial relationship” with an individual in the United States;  a worker who has accepted an offer of employment from a U.S. company or a lecturer who has been invited to address a U.S. audience; and a student who has been admitted to a U.S. university. If the relationship is with a U.S. entity, it must be “formal, documented, and formed in the ordinary course” of business.

The limited reinstatement of the travel ban is anticipated to take effect on or about June 29, 2017. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security has advised that it will provide additional details on implementation of the executive order and such implementation will be done with “clear and sufficient public notice, particularly to potentially affected travelers, and in coordination with partners in the travel industry.”

© 2022, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 178
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Associate

Tina joined the immigration practice at Ogletree Deakins in February 2010. Her experience primarily consists of assisting employers with obtaining temporary work visas and permanent residency on behalf of new and current employees. She handles all types of lawful permanent residence applications, including those based on PERM labor certification applications, and on behalf of multinational managers and executives, outstanding professors, researchers and aliens of extraordinary ability.

Tina received her B.A. in Economics from University of North...

919-789-3193
Jacob D. Cherry, Ogletree Deakins, employment based immigration attorney, worksite compliance matters lawyer
Associate

Jacob D. Cherry is an immigration attorney in the Atlanta office.  His practice is focused on employment-based immigration and worksite compliance matters.

Jacob works with multinational organizations to secure immigration benefits for their employees and provide guidance on immigration-related compliance matters. Jacob also counsels and advises employers on the implementation of immigration programs that align with specific hiring, employee retention, and global mobility goals, and he partners with companies to develop immigration strategies to...

404-946-0864
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement