September 21, 2018

September 21, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 20, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 19, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

U.S. Government Accountability Office Issues Recommendations on Fintech Regulations

The U.S. GAO issued its anticipated 132-page report entitled “Financial Technology: Additional Steps by Regulators Could Better Protect Consumers and Aid Regulatory Oversight.”   In the report, the GAO describes the benefits and risks; regulatory oversight and challenges; and regulatory efforts to foster innovation with respect to the following four specified FinTech activities: person to person payments, marketplace lending, digital wealth management and distributed ledger technology.  It also offers recommendations about how to enhance FinTech regulation.

Notably, the GAO indicates that “[f]intech products pose similar risks as traditional products, but their risks may not always be sufficiently addressed by existing laws and regulations.”  It states that efforts by regulators to “monitor developments and risks posed by [FinTech companies] and their financial innovations remains a sound approach.”  The GAO also acknowledges a concern raised by many FinTech industry participants — the significant costs and time required to comply with the fragmented patch-work of state laws that apply to FinTech companies, including money transmitters, consumer lenders and small robo-advisers.  Some industry participants maintain that these challenges impede industry innovation, although they also concede the need for some regulation as with traditional products and services.

Among other things, the GAO makes specific recommendations to the federal financial regulatory agencies, as well as the FTC, FCC, FINRA and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (“CSBS”) on ways to improve FinTech regulation, including through interagency cooperation and consideration of non-U.S. regulatory approaches like regulatory sandboxes that enable FinTech companies to test new products and services in “limited-risk environments.”  In written comments in an appendix to the report, the regulatory agencies concurred with their respective GAO recommendations and detailed the steps that have or will be taken to achieve them.  Of particular interest was the CSBS 14-page response that noted the ways in which states are streamlining their licensing processes, and that described the OCC’s FinTech special purpose charter as “an unprecedented level of preemption of state usury laws.”  This well-documented report provides helpful insights into the regulatory perspectives of U.S. state and federal regulators regarding new FinTech technologies.

Copyright 2018 K & L Gates

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Judith E. Rinearson, KL Gates, federal consumer protection lawyer, anti money laundering attorney
Partner

Judith Rinearson is a partner in the firm’s New York and London offices. Ms. Rinearson concentrates her practice in prepaid and emerging payment systems, electronic payments, crypto/virtual currencies, reward programs, ACH and check processing. She has more than 25 years of experience in the financial services industry, including 18 years at American Express’s General Counsel’s Office. Her expertise focuses particularly in the areas of emerging payments and compliance with state and federal consumer protection laws, anti-money laundering laws, state money transmitter...

212-536-3928