February 22, 2019

February 21, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 20, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 19, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

What Remedy for Transgender Students if HHS Succeeds in Narrowly Redefining Gender Under Title IX?

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently revealed the agency's proposal to narrow the legal definition of sex under Title IX, the federal civil rights law that bans discrimination based on sex in education programs receiving federal funding.

If the proposed definition of gender is adopted by HHS and other federal agencies that enforce Title IX, transgender students would be limited in their ability to obtain assistance from the federal government when faced with discrimination. However, transgender students alleging discrimination may still bring suit against universities and may have options to obtain relief under institutional policies and procedures.

In a recent leaked memo obtained by The New York Times, HHS urges government agencies enforcing Title IX, including the Departments of Education (DOE), Justice (DOJ), and Labor, to adopt a uniform definition of gender based "on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable." Specifically, HHS proposed sex to mean "a person's status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth."

HHS further proposed that the sex "listed on a person's birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person's sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence." The proposal could affect an estimated 1.4 million Americans who identify as a gender other than that assigned at birth.

The proposed change could impact the manner in which educational institutions address discrimination that arises in a variety of contexts, including admissions policies, bathroom and locker room access, and athletic participation. The proposal also may have implications for the DOE's expected proposed rule dealing with allegations of sexual harassment at colleges and universities.

This proposal is consistent with the Trump administration's systematic efforts to roll back the Obama administration's inclusive application of civil rights protections to transgender individuals. The current legal landscape, however, is anything but certain.

As we commented earlier this year, the Trump administration's revocation of the 2015 and 2016 Title IX guidance requiring schools to treat transgender students in accordance with their gender identity comes in opposition to recent federal court decisions. Last year, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions revoked the Obama administration's protection against discrimination based on gender identity in the employment context, and established the DOJ's position that Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination "does not encompass discrimination based on gender identity per se, including transgender status."

However, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has refused to reverse course and continues to interpret Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as "forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation." In addition, a number of states and municipalities have extended workplace nondiscrimination provisions to transgender individuals.

Copyright © by Ballard Spahr LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Patricia Smith, Ballard Spahr Law Firm, New Jersey, Labor and Employment Litigation Attorney
Partner

Patricia A. Smith represents management in all areas of employment and labor law and litigation. She has experience in a variety of industries, including health care, transportation, refining, manufacturing, construction, and commercial lending. Ms. Smith regularly provides advice and counseling to employers concerning the implementation of reductions in force and other difficult employment decisions. She also practices traditional labor law and regularly handles labor arbitrations, union organizing campaigns, collective bargaining negotiations, and unfair labor practice...

856-873-5521
Olabisi Okubadejo, Ballard Spahr Law Firm, Baltimore, Higher Education and Labor Employment Attorney
Of Counsel

Olabisi "Bisi" Ladeji Okubadejo represents institutions of higher education and business entities in civil rights and employment matters, with a particular focus on matters arising from alleged discrimination on the basis of race, disability, age, religion, and sex, including sexual harassment and sexual violence. She has experience both as an attorney in private practice and with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR). She advises clients on complying with various federal laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act, Title IX, the Clery Act, the Violence Against Women’s Act, FERPA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Age Discrimination Act.

410-528-5532
Maraya N. Pratt, Ballard Spahr, litigation lawyer
Associate

Maraya N. Pratt is an associate in the firm’s Litigation Department. Prior to joining the firm, Maraya’s practice focused on civil litigation within the insurance industry, including insurance fraud, coverage and liability issues, and tort defense.

During law school, Maraya gained additional litigation experience while serving as a law clerk at the Maryland Attorney General's Health Occupations Prosecution and Litigation Division assisting in the prosecution of disciplinary matters against health care professionals, and as a law clerk at a Maryland based business litigation law firm...

410 528 5578