When A Majority Vote May Not Suffice
Monday, August 2, 2021

The California General Corporation Law imposes an intricate set of rules with respect to shareholder approval of reorganizations (defined in Section 181).  In general, the GCL requires that the principal terms of a reorganization be "approved by the outstanding shares" (as defined in Section 152) of each class of each corporation the approval of whose board is required under Corporations Code Section 1200.  Cal. Corp. Code § 1201(a).  However, GCL includes numerous exceptions to this general rule.  Space does not permit a discussion of all of these exceptions.   However, three of these exceptions are worth noting because they impose supermajority approval requirements.  Two of these exceptions require a two-thirds vote and one requires unanimous approval. 

A two-thirds vote of each class (or a greater vote if required by the articles) of the outstanding shares of a close corporation (defined in Section 158) is required if the reorganization would result in their receiving shares of a corporation that is not a close corporation.   Cal. Corp. Code § 1201(e).   However, the articles may provide for a lesser vote, but that vote may not be less than a majority of the outstanding shares of each class.

A two-thirds vote of each class (or a greater vote if required by the articles) of a corporation that is a party to a merger reorganization (defined in Section 181(a)) is also required if the holders receive shares of a surviving social purposes corporation in the merger.   Cal. Corp. Code § 1201(f).   A social purpose corporation is a corporation formed under California's Social Purpose Corporations Act.  Cal. Corp. Code § 2509.   The Social Purpose Corporations Act is not part of the General Corporation Law.

Approval of all the shareholders of any class or series is required if, as a result of the reorganization, the holders of that class or series become personally liable for any obligations of a party to the reorganization.   Cal. Corp. Code § 1201(h).   No such proposal is required if all holders of that class or series have dissenters' rights provided in Chapter 13 of the GCL.

 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins