October 30, 2020

Volume X, Number 304

Advertisement

October 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Whistleblower Protections in ARRA

Public and private employers who receive funds under the newly enacted federal stimulus package will face new responsibilities and increased risks of whistleblower complaints. The stimulus package legislation includes safeguards against fraud, waste and abuse as part of its “Additional Accountability and Transparency Requirements.” These safeguards include whistleblower protections that are more robust than existing whistleblower protections administered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and U.S. Department of Labor.

Detailed provisions of section 1553 of ARRA encourage employee disclosure of mismanagement, waste, danger to public health or safety, abuse, or unlawful activity involving funds from government contracts, grants, or other payments made available under ARRA.

Whistleblowers’ disclosures are protected if made by an employee who reasonably believes there is evidence of gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, danger to public health or safety related to use of covered funds, or abuse of authority related to covered funds. Employees disclosures are protected if made to the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, an Inspector General of an agency that expends or obligates covered funds, the Comptroller General, a member of Congress, a state or federal regulatory or law enforcement agency, a person with supervisory authority over the employee, a court, grand jury, or head of a federal agency.

Whistleblowers are protected from reprisals including discharge, demotion, or other discrimination. If these whistleblower protections are broadly interpreted consistent with other federal employment protections, prohibited conduct may include oral or written reprimands and lateral transfers or reassignment of duties, even where there are no tangible economic adverse consequences.

Copyright © 2008 Fairfield and Woods, P.C., ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDNational Law Review, Volume , Number 201
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Craig Joyce, Litigation lawyer, Fairfield and Woods
Director

Craig D. Joyce is the chair of the firm’s Litigation Department and devotes his practice to civil litigation in state and federal courts and administrative agencies. He handles litigation matters at all levels of trial courts, arbitration forums and appeals courts.

Many of Craig's cases involve real estate litigation, including condemnation and foreclosure. He also represents a wide variety of litigants in many other areas, including partnership dissolution, automobile dealership law, trade secrets, government procurement bid protests, title insurance, class actions and probate...

303-894-4480
Advertisement
Advertisement