August 3, 2020

Volume X, Number 216

August 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 31, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Worth the Fight: IP Dispute Resolution that won't Break the Bank

Small businesses and individual rights holders are set to benefit from the Intellectual Property National Pilot Scheme in the Federal Circuit Court

A specialist IP list in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCC) is open for business, with the goal of achieving quick, cheap and effective dispute resolution of intellectual property matters.

The Intellectual Property National Pilot Scheme commenced on 1 July 2018 and appeals to small and medium-sized enterprises, individual rights holders and young innovators who may have previously avoided the court system even though they had a legitimate right or a good defence, but found that it simply wasn’t worth the fight.

All intellectual property matters filed in the FCC will be docketed to Judge Julia Baird. Prior to her appointment, Judge Baird was a Sydney based barrister specialising in intellectual property.

The scheme aims to give litigants greater certainty in enforcing and defending their rights with timeliness, lower cost and less risk.  For instance, upon issuing proceedings, an applicant will pay A$655 (individual rate) or A$1,605 (corporate rate) compared with A$1,390 (individual rate)/A$4,045 (corporate rate) in the Federal Court. The FCC will aim to list the matter for case management within three weeks of initiating proceedings.

While intellectual property matters could previously be filed in the FCC, the list is significant because it represents a dedicated approach to IP matters with a Judge that specialised in intellectual property.

On 21 August 2018, the FCC published a practice direction, which sets out the arrangement for management of intellectual property matters in the FCC.

What do I need to know?

  • The FCC has jurisdiction to hear and determine copyright, designs, trade marks and plant breeder’s rights, as well as consumer law claims.
  • The FCC has concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Court and matters can be transferred between the courts.
  • Costs are awarded on a party-party basis according to the FCC scale, although the Court has discretion to depart from this approach.
Copyright 2020 K & L GatesNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 236


About this Author

Chris Round, Partner, KLGates

Mr. Round is an intellectual property lawyer with extensive experience in the registration of intellectual property rights and associated litigation. He represents clients in copyright, trade mark, patent, designs and associated trade practices litigation in all Australian Courts.

Mr. Round prosecutes trade mark applications and oppositions before IP Australia and the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) and appears at Australian trade mark hearings

Olivia Coburn, IP lawyer, KLGates

Ms. Coburn is a lawyer in the Intellectual Property group in Melbourne. She regularly advises clients on protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights including trade marks, design and copyright infringement as well as the misuse of confidential information and trade practices cases.

Ms. Coburn also assists clients with advice on brand name and product clearance, domain name recovery, customs programs, anti-counterfeiting programs and the filing and prosecution of registered designs