June 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 168


June 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

You Asked They Answered: The CFTC Publishes Updated FAQ For Form CPO-PQR


On 26 May 2021, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC or the Commission) Market Participants Division (MPD) published updated responses to frequently asked questions regarding Form CPO-PQR and CFTC Regulation 4.27 (the 2021 FAQ). The purpose of the 2021 FAQ is to provide guidance to commodity pool operators (CPOs) filing the recently revised Form CPO-PQR.1


Form CPO-PQR is a filing designed to collect data from registered CPOs2 about each of their operated commodity pools. CFTC Regulation 4.27 requires that CPOs file Form CPO-PQR with the National Futures Association (NFA).3 The Commission began requiring CPOs to file Form CPO-PQR in 2012.4

On 6 October 2020, the Commission adopted a final rule that amended CFTC Regulation 4.27 and Form CPO-PQR (the 2020 Final Rule).5 Specifically, the 2020 Final Rule eliminated previously-existing Schedules B and C of Form CPO-PQR, except for the Pool Schedule of Investments; amended the information requirements of Schedule A of Form CPO-PQR; required all reporting CPOs to submit Form CPO-PQR every quarter; allowed CPOs to substitute compliance with the NFA’s Form PQR; and eliminated the option to substitute compliance through Joint Form PF.6


The 2021 FAQ answers several questions specific to the changes made by the 2020 Final Rule. Further, the 2021 FAQ updates previous, outdated responses provided in an FAQ released by the CFTC Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight on 5 November 2015. We discuss certain notable clarifications or guidance below.

The 2021 FAQ clarifies that if one or more of a CPO’s pools cease operations on or before the end of a Reporting Period (the date upon which Form CPO-PQR filing requirements become determinable or “attach”), the reporting CPO should exclude the ceased pool from its Form CPO-PQR filing because the pool would no longer have “directed assets…under the advisement of the CPO,” as required by 17 CFR 4.27(c)(1).7 However, other compliance obligations, such as the final Annual Report, may still apply.

According to the 2021 FAQ, pools that invest in other pools, including those that are exempt under 17 CFR 4.13(a)(3), as well as pools excluded from the CPO definition under 17 CFR 4.5, must still be itemized and included in the Pool Schedule of Investments.8 Further, a reporting CPO is required to include pools operated pursuant to CFTC Advisory 18-969 or an exemption under 17 CFR 4.7 in its Form CPO-PQR.10

The 2021 FAQ states that the Commission’s preferred approach for reporting the rates of return of a pool with more than one share class without a limitation of liability among the classes is reporting the monthly rates of return on an aggregate basis across all share classes based on the net asset value of the pool.11

Lastly, the 2021 FAQ states that dually-registered investment advisers and CPOs (IA-CPOs) are no longer permitted to file the SEC’s Form PF in lieu of the CFTC’s Form CPO-PQR.


  • Since IA-CPOs are no longer permitted to file the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the SEC) Form PF in lieu of Form CPO-PQR, some market participants, will need to amend their compliance and operational procedures, which may result in an additional compliance burden every quarter.

  • Form CPO-PQR applies to registered CPOs. Nevertheless, data pertaining to exempt commodity pools is also required to be reported under some circumstances.

  • In addition to the 2021 FAQ, NFA Members should carefully review the instructions and guidance contained in the NFA FAQs prior to filing Form PQR.12 As a reminder, NFA Members must file Form PQR with the NFA.

1 The 2021 FAQ can be found here.

2 The Commodity Exchange Act defines a CPO, in essence, as any person engaged in a business that is of the nature of a commodity pool, investment trust, syndicate, or similar form of enterprise, and who, with respect to that commodity pool, solicits, accepts, or receives from others, funds, securities, or property, either directly or through capital contributions, the sale of stock or other forms of securities, or otherwise, for the purpose of trading in commodity interests. See 7 U.S.C. § 1a(11)(A)(i).

3 17 CFR § 4.27(c)(1).

4 See Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors: Compliance Obligations, 77 Fed. Reg. 11252 (Feb. 24, 2012).

5 See Compliance Requirements for Commodity Pool Operators on Form CPO-PQR, 85 Fed. Reg. 71772 (Nov. 10, 2020).

6 See id.

See the response to Question 1 in the 2021 FAQ.

8 See the response to Question 4 in the 2021 FAQ.

9 CFTC Advisory 18-96 provides certain CPOs who operate offshore commodity pools relief from certain disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements as well as the location of books and records requirement, provided that certain conditions are met.

10 See the response to Question 5 in the 2021 FAQ.

11 See the response to Question 14 in the 2021 FAQ.

12  See NFA FAQs for CPO Form PQR available here.

Copyright 2021 K & L GatesNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 159



About this Author

Stephen Humenik Financial Attorney KL Gates Law Firm

Stephen M. Humenik is a partner at the firm’s Washington, D.C. and Chicago offices. He has over twenty years of experience on cross-border regulatory, compliance and enforcement matters involving the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and global markets for derivatives, physical and financial commodities. Mr. Humenik applies his business, operational, and government experience to the implementation of CFTC regulations, including the trading, registration, clearing and other compliance obligations of the Dodd-Frank Act and other global regulatory reforms. Mr. Humenik counsels...

Matthew J. Rogers Investment Management Attorney K&L Gates Boston, MA

Matthew Rogers is an associate in the firm’s investment management group. Mr. Rogers focuses his practice on advising investment advisers, open and closed-end investment companies, unregistered funds and other financial service providers.

He has experience drafting and reviewing registration statements, board materials and other regulatory and legal documentation for the formation, organization and ongoing operations of registered funds. He assists clients in obtaining regulatory relief from certain U.S. federal securities laws and resolving SEC staff comments on regulatory filings...


Michael Lee is an associate at the firm's Washington, D.C. office and is a member of the Asset Management and Investment Funds practice. He is also a part of the firm's derivatives team and financial services policy team. He is a registered lobbyist.