Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jun
18
2020
President Of Medical Technology Company Charged For Promoting Fake COVID-19 Treatment Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2024
Lenders Sue to Block Colorado’s Interest Rate ‘Opt-Out’ Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2024
The End of the World Order and the Rise of Trade Regulation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2020
Up in Smoke: COVID-19’s Impacts on Hemp & Cannabis M&A Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2020
National Security Meets Teenage Dance Battles: Trump Issues Executive Orders Impacting TikTok and WeChat Business in the U.S. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
21
2014
China State Council Approves Adjustment of Special Access Management Measures in Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2020
Lend Me Your EARs: CFIUS Makes Export Controls a Trigger for Mandatory Filings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
13
2020
Huya DouYu Merger is a Sign of Things to Come in Esports M&A Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
16
2015
Havana Hold Your Hand: Reaching Out to Cuban Entrepreneurs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
23
2015
Revised “Fred Meyer Guides” Leave Treatment of Key Robinson-Patman Act Provisions Unchanged Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2021
Top 10 Diligence Issues in Lead Generation Mergers and Acquisitions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2015
China Ripe For Enforcing AML Based On Concerted Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2021
The New Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 and Potential Effects on Foreign Businesses and High Net Worth Individuals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
10
2021
Looking Ahead on China: Engaging in Strategic Compliance through Geopolitical Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
14
2015
“Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing”: A Sea Change Or Not? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
1
2015
Ninth Circuit Declares That Individualized Damages Issues Alone Never, Ever Preclude Certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) Class Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
30
2021
President’s Executive Order Aims to Foster a Competitive Marketplace Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
5
2021
California Jury Awards Millions to Cannabis Company in Antitrust Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
12
2021
HSR Considerations For Chinese Investors In U.S. Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2016
Morton Salt Presumption Of Injury Under Robinson-Patman Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
30
2016
European Court of Justice to Rule on Legality of Online Sales Bans Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2022
FTC Continues to Signal Interest in Digital Health Industry, Publishing Updated Resources Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
23
2016
Organizational Conflicts of Interest: When Whole Is Less Than Sum of Parts (What You Need to Know About Mergers and Acquisitions Part VI) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
13
2017
The Future of Russia Sanctions: The Awkward Edition Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2010
Banning "Pay-For Delay" Settlements and Resale Price Maintenance are Senate Antitrust Subcommittee's Top Legislative Priorities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
4
2010
Silicon Valley Firms Settle DOJ Hiring Practices Charges, but are No-Solicitation Agreements per se Illegal? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2011
First Section 2 Monopolization Case Of the Obama Administration Targets Dominant Texas Health Care Provider Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
10
2017
Blockchain Walks the Runway As The New FastTech Fashion Tool Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins