Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
May
18
2023
Solving Open Source Problems with AI Code Generators – Legal Issues and Solutions, Part 1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2023
Ninth Circuit Slashes Exorbitant Attorney’s Fee Award That Would “Make the Average Person Shake Her Head in Disbelief” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2023
State Privacy Law Roundup: What Retailers Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
3
2023
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschlan GMBH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Ruling of Obviousness for the Colorization of Fabrics Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
21
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Is There a Duty to Disclose the Use of AI? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2024
Bid Protest Hub – February 2024 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2024
2023 Federal Circuit Case Summaries Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2020
Federal Circuit Makes It More Difficult for Accused Infringers to File Declaratory Judgment Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 5 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
6
2016
National Cancer Moonshot: USPTO Cancer Immunotherapy Fast Track Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2020
3D-Printed Masks, Disinfecting Devices, and Simplified Ventilators – a Sampling of Tech Advances in the Age of COVID-19 from California Universities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2020
Why Patents Can Matter In Trade Secret Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
24
2014
Trending Information: The Connection Between Data Brokers and the Fashion Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
15
2021
The China Pivot: Closing the “Back Door” to Trade Secret and IP Theft Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2021
Nota Bene Episode 141: Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Past, Present, and Forward with Siraj Husain [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2021
Benefits and Considerations for Patent Prosecution under Patent Prosecution Highway in the U.S., Europe, China, and Singapore Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
20
2021
Benefits and Considerations for Patent Prosecution Under Patent Prosecution Highway in Australia, Canada, South Korea, and Japan Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
8
2009
Does Edwards v. Arthur Anderson Bar The Use of Employee Confidentiality Agreements? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2010
It's Not Over For MGA's Bratz Doll Line Yet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2015
B&B Hardware v. Hargis – U.S. Supreme Court Declares TTAB Findings Can Have Preclusive Effect on Subsequent Federal Court Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
2
2011
China Revamps Its Outdated Copyright Pledges System Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2011
Indirect Purchaser Plavix Class Actions Tossed for Lack of Antitrust Standing Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
24
2011
Antitrust Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Action Lacks Plausible Allegations of Competitive Injury Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
26
2011
ANDA Automatic Stay of FDA Approval Does Not Defeat Standing in Sham Litigation Antitrust Counterclaim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2017
An EC Communication on SEPs – Not More Not Less Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2011
Safe-Harbor Provision of Hatch-Waxman Act Does Not Protect Post-Approval Research Activities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins