Tadhg is a Partner in the firm’s Litigation Department, where his practice focuses on appellate and complex civil litigation. He has extensive experience handling appeals in state and federal courts throughout the country and has obtained favorable results for a diverse range of clients, from federal prisoners to foreign presidents, big companies to small towns. Among other recent successes, Tadhg helped a municipality overturn a $6.8 million verdict in the Connecticut Appellate Court, and helped a dental practice overturn a $3.7 million verdict in the Georgia Supreme Court. Tadhg has also been called on to craft amicus curiae briefs advancing the positions of clients in the U.S. and Connecticut Supreme Courts.
At the trial level, Tadhg has represented clients confronting a variety of legal challenges, including defamation and libel suits, consumer class actions, alleged Title IX violations, and lawsuits concerning institutional responses to child sexual abuse. Among other favorable outcomes, he recently persuaded a trial court to dismiss a sexual-abuse lawsuit brought by 19 plaintiffs against a national youth services organization and successfully defended a Connecticut municipality in a bench trial relating to the validity of its mayoral election.
Tadhg has devoted significant time to pro bono matters at the trial and appellate levels. Along with Wiggin and Dana attorney Ben Daniels, he runs the Appellate Litigation Project at Yale Law School, supervising students representing indigent clients in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits. He has been honored by Connecticut Legal Services for his pro bono work on behalf of a single mother facing a defamation lawsuit and received Wiggin and Dana’s Pro Bono Achievement Award in connection with his successful appeal of an Espionage Act sentence in the Second Circuit.
Latest Legal and Business Bylines From Tadhg A.J. Dooley
- Supreme Court Update: TransUnion v. Ramirez (No. 20-297), PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (No. 19-1039) - (Posted On Tuesday, July 06, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (No. 19-1257), Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (No. 19-251), Johnson v. Guzman Chavez (No. 19-987) - (Posted On Tuesday, July 06, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: Brnovich v. AZ, Americans for Prosperity Fnd. v. Bonta, Minerva Surgical v. Hologic, Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, PennEast Pipeline Co. v. NJ, Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation - (Posted On Thursday, July 01, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation (No. 20-543), Transunion LLC v. Ramirez (No. 20-297), Hollyfrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Ass’n (No. 20-472), Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (No. 20-255), - (Posted On Tuesday, June 29, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (No. 20-255), Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (No. 20-107), Collins v. Yellen (No. 19-422), Lange v. California (No. 20-18), NCAA v. Alston (No. 20-512), United States v. Arthrex (No. 19-1434), Gold - (Posted On Thursday, June 24, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: NCAA v. Alston, United States v. Arthrex, Goldman Sachs Group v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, California v. Texas, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Nestle USA, Inc. v. Doe - (Posted On Tuesday, June 22, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: California v. Texas (No. 19-840), Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (No. 19-123), Nestle USA v. Doe (No. 19-416), Borden v. United States (No. 19-5410), Greer v. United States (No. 19-8709), Terry v. United States (No. 20-5904) - (Posted On Friday, June 18, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: Borden v. United States (No. 19-5410), Van Buren v. United States (No. 19-783), Sanchez v. Mayorkas (No. 20-315) - (Posted On Thursday, June 10, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: Van Buren v. United States (No. 19-783), United States v. Cooley (No. 19-1414), Garland v. Ming Dai (No. 19-1155) - (Posted On Monday, June 07, 2021)
- Supreme Court Update: United States v. Palomar-Santiago (No. 20-437), Guam v. United States (No. 20-382), San Antonio v. Hotels.com (No. 20-334) - (Posted On Tuesday, June 01, 2021)
Tadhg Dooley is a Partner in Wiggin and Dana's Litigation Department, where his practice focuses on appellate and complex civil litigation, also drafting amicus curiae briefs advancing the positions of clients in the U.S. and Connecticut Supreme Courts. Mr. Dooley was named a 2019 NLR Go-To Thought Leader for his regular and comprehensive overview of U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) litigation co-written with Wiggin and Dana colleague David Roth. Dooley & Roth's Supreme Court updates are well thought out and provide the National Law Review's readers with a timely interpretation of the issues and before the Court.