Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
31
2023
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
5
2019
Do NOT Give NDAs the Short Shrift Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
17
2023
United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
11
2013
Apple is Fighting Back in Brazilian Courts to Get its iPhone Trademark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates Invalidity Judgement Based on Collateral Estoppel from a Case Subsequently Vacated and Rebukes Plaintiff’s About-Face on Its Stipulated Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2016
Federal Circuit Limits Estoppel Provision of AIA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2019
Left Empty Handed: Value Shut Down on Written Prior Art, Highlighting Importance of System Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
19
2024
Divided 9th Circuit Says District Court Has Power to Adjudicate TM Applications Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2016
Federal Circuit Affirms Refusal to Register “Churrascos” Based on Genericness, Despite Prior Federal Registration of the Mark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
22
2020
The Federal Circuit Reconsiders the Inherent Distinctiveness of Color Marks in In re Forney Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
19
2020
COVID-19 Web-Based IP Platform to Facilitate Connections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
8
2020
Alice and Incongruity in PTAB Appeals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2021
Cementing Victory by Accepting Defeat: When Can a Patentee’s Infringement Disclaimer Moot an Appeal of an IPR Decision? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
8
2014
FTC Proposes Consent Order to Settle Charges Alleging Misrepresentations by Patent Assertion Entity Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2021
Activision Files Lawsuit Over the Rights to Use the Word Warzone in the Call Of Duty Series Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
21
2021
NFT License Breakdown: Exploring Different Marketplaces and Associated License Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2009
Cairns Patent Once Again Provokes the Promotions Industry to Re-Evaluate Online Promotional Games Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
29
2010
Patent Exhaustion Doctrine in China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
26
2011
Frankenstein's Monster: Data Rights Changes Adopted In The National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2011 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2015
Board Games (Silicon Valley, Episode 16) Board Seats and Board Composition Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2015
What’s in a Name? That Which We Call a Biological Product… Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2023
French Insider Episode 20: Growing Your Business in America: The Story of Qobuz and Its Growth in Music Streaming with Dan Mackta [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
19
2023
Design Patent Protection for Computer Generated Icons and Graphical User Interfaces Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2023
Congress Proposes National Commission to Create AI Guardrails Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
28
2023
How Quickly are Judge Albright Patent Cases Going to Trial? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2013
Four Wheel Fashion Re: Lifestyle Branding & Trademark Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2019
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. Nos. 2022-1532, 2022-1533, (Fed. Cir. August 7, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standards to Establish Nexus Between Objective Evidence and Non-Obviousness, and to Establish Copying in Medtronic et al. v. Teleflex Innovations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2020
Federal Circuit Makes It More Difficult for Accused Infringers to File Declaratory Judgment Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins