Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
21
2011
About Face: Lancôme's Airbrushed Makeup Ads Banned in the UK Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
28
2023
How Quickly are Judge Albright Patent Cases Going to Trial? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2019
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. Nos. 2022-1532, 2022-1533, (Fed. Cir. August 7, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standards to Establish Nexus Between Objective Evidence and Non-Obviousness, and to Establish Copying in Medtronic et al. v. Teleflex Innovations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2015
August 2015 - Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2020
Federal Circuit Makes It More Difficult for Accused Infringers to File Declaratory Judgment Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 5 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2020
3D-Printed Masks, Disinfecting Devices, and Simplified Ventilators – a Sampling of Tech Advances in the Age of COVID-19 from California Universities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
11
2013
Comments on Recent Changes to the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2013
Federal Circuit Affirms Inequitable Conduct Determination Under Therasense “But For” Exception and Reaffirms Significance of Rohm & Haas Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2020
Why Patents Can Matter In Trade Secret Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
17
2013
Creditors’ Rights Clarified By Interpretation II of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People’s Republic of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
15
2021
The China Pivot: Closing the “Back Door” to Trade Secret and IP Theft Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2016
Federal Circuit is In Sync with Patent’s Validity Under Section 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2021
Nota Bene Episode 141: Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Past, Present, and Forward with Siraj Husain [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2021
Benefits and Considerations for Patent Prosecution under Patent Prosecution Highway in the U.S., Europe, China, and Singapore Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
20
2021
Benefits and Considerations for Patent Prosecution Under Patent Prosecution Highway in Australia, Canada, South Korea, and Japan Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2017
An EC Communication on SEPs – Not More Not Less Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2022
Insufficient Evidence: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2022
The Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2009
Employers Should Carefully Consider Whether To Sue Former Employees For Threatened Trade Secret Misappropriation Based On Recent California Court of Appeal Decision Awarding Over $1.6 Million To Former Employees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
25
2010
California Court Takes On Trade-Secret Preemption of Other Civil Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2010
Gucci's Attempt to Extend Trademark Infringement Liability to Credit Card Merchant Service Providers Survives Motion to Dismiss Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2023
Solving Open Source Problems with AI Code Generators – Legal Issues and Solutions, Part 1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2023
Ninth Circuit Slashes Exorbitant Attorney’s Fee Award That Would “Make the Average Person Shake Her Head in Disbelief” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
2
2015
Other Peoples’ (Adult) Content (Episode 15) of Silicon Valley Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2023
State Privacy Law Roundup: What Retailers Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
3
2023
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschlan GMBH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Ruling of Obviousness for the Colorization of Fabrics Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
21
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Is There a Duty to Disclose the Use of AI? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2024
Bid Protest Hub – February 2024 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2024
2023 Federal Circuit Case Summaries Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins