11th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The Eleventh Circuit of the US Court of Appeals is located in the Southeastern region of the United States. It spans across Florida, Alabama, and Georgia. The US Court of Appeals for the circuit is in Georgia, and is the Elbert P. Tuttle US Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta. Although these districts were originally a part of the Fifth Circuit, in 1981 Congressional Legislation split the two circuits into the Fifth and Eleventh US Circuits.

The US Court of Appeals is in Atlanta, Georgia. The Middle District courthouse in GA is in Macon, and the Southern District courthouse is in Savannah, GA. In Alabama, the Middle District court is in Montgomery, the Northern District Court is in Birmingham, and the Southern District courthouse is in Mobile, AL. In the state of Florida, the Middle District is in Orlando, Northern District is in the state’s capital of Tallahassee, and the Southern District courthouse is in Miami, Florida.

There are currently 12 active judges sitting on the bench for the Eleventh Circuit; of these judges, seven are senior judges for their respective districts. Edward Earl Carnes is the Chief Justice for the Circuit and Clarence Thomas, who is also a US Supreme Court Associate Justice, is the Circuit Justice.

Smith v Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County (1987) was one of the cases which set precedent for future cases in the Eleventh Circuit. The court held that schools in Mobile County, AL could use textbooks, even though some parents believed they promoted secular humanism as a religion. USA v Alabama (2011) was another precedent-setting case dealing with immigration and border control issues. The US filed a lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief claiming a new AL state law was preempted by the Federal Immigration Law, Immigration & Nationality Act, and a violation of the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution.

The National Law Review covers several cases in the Eleventh Circuit. Immigration is a major area of law which is dealt with in the lower states. Elderly law (nursing home, abuse, etc.), labor and employment rights, tax evasion and tax appeal, bankruptcy, intellectual property, and tort cases are highly covered on the site. Additionally, the National Law Review covers the latest legislative, election, and agency news, as well as news coming directly from the circuit courts, on our website.  

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
18
2020
TCPA Quick Hitter: Another TCPA Plaintiff Wins By Convincing the Court it Was Not Harmed—Which Only Makes Sense in TCPAWorld Troutman Amin, LLP
Aug
18
2020
Court Tosses Hogwash Claims, OKs Pork Producer’s Use of “Prime” in Advertising Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
12
2020
Standing Argument Focusing On Who Paid for the Cell Phone Fails, Again Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
5
2020
Michael P. v. BCBS of Texas [PODCAST] K&L Gates
Aug
5
2020
Eleventh Circuit Determines AEGIS Must Defend Landlord in Security Deposit Class Action Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
31
2020
Employers Need Not Tolerate HR Professionals Who Encourage Coworkers to File Discrimination Suits Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
23
2020
Healthcare Enforcement Mid-Year Roundup: 2020 McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
15
2020
We Harmed Him—Really We Did: NHL Hockey Team Argues Unwanted Texts it Sent Actually Did Injure People Because…TCPAWorld Troutman Amin, LLP
Jul
15
2020
What is an ATDS Anyway? Here is Your DEFINITIVE Guide to the Massive Circuit Split Surrounding the TCPA’s ATDS Definition Troutman Amin, LLP
Jul
12
2020
How Many Texts Equal a “Concrete Injury in Fact?” – Two is Not Enough Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
10
2020
Supreme Court Agrees to Review Growing Circuit Split on Definition of ATDS K&L Gates
Jul
6
2020
Supreme Court Decides No Signature, No Problem Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
30
2020
Strike! Eleventh Circuit in Bowling Upends Decades of Removal Jurisprudence in FCRA Case Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
29
2020
Eleventh Circuit Examines FCRA Willfulness Standard Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
29
2020
District Court Protects DACA, Affirms DOJ Guidance in Hiring Discrimination Case Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
26
2020
Experian Avoids Hefty Punitive Damage Award, but Still Has to Pay $5,000 for a Single FCRA Violation For Claimed Pain and Suffering Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
24
2020
New Litigation May Further Clarify the FCRA’s Definition of “Consumer Reporting Agency” Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
24
2020
Sublimit in Primary Policy Quashes Excess Insurer’s Obligation to Follow Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
22
2020
TCPA Quick Hitter: Ringless Voicemail User Denied Early Appellate Bid in Eleventh Circuit Troutman Amin, LLP
Jun
17
2020
Wholesale Scraping of “Public” Data May Be Trade Secret Misappropriation Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
15
2020
Title VII Prohibits Gay and Transgender Discrimination, SCOTUS Rules Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
29
2020
TCPA Plaintiff Could Not Get Away with Forum Shopping Antics Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
28
2020
Double Meaning Can Make Mark Distinctive McDermott Will & Emery
May
26
2020
COVID-19, Executive Authority and Fundamental Rights: What Do the Courts Say? Faegre Drinker
May
18
2020
A Rubric for Design Patent Claim Construction to a “Tee” Foley & Lardner LLP
May
18
2020
Southern District of Florida Court Holds that TCPA Plaintiff is Not the “Called-Party” Due to Call Forwarding Faegre Drinker
May
18
2020
The Daubert Toolbox: Revisiting and Appreciating Joiner, the Middle Child Faegre Drinker
May
15
2020
FCRA Case Addressing Definition of “Consumer Report” Headed to the Jury Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
13
2020
11th Circuit Holds that Consumers Cannot Unilaterally Revoke Contractual Consent to Automated Calls Faegre Drinker
May
7
2020
COVID-19 Related Workplace Litigation Tracker - June 19 , 2020 Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
7
2020
District of New Jersey Adopts Narrow ATDS Definition as Circuit Split Grows; Supreme Court Clarification Required Faegre Drinker
May
5
2020
3M Takes Action to Protect Its Brand from Price Gouging And Trademark Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
LOCKED IN: 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Holds Contractual Consent for Robocalls Cannot be Revoked–but TCPAWorld Remains Split on the Issue Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
4
2020
Eleventh Circuit Implements Supreme Court’s Young v. UPS Test in Assessing Indirect Evidence of Intentional Pregnancy Discrimination Proskauer Rose LLP
May
1
2020
Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal Holds Contractual TCPA Consent Cannot Be Revoked Troutman Amin, LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins