8th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit sits in St. Louis Missouri. The Courthouse is the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse. In addition to the Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit spans over 6-US states, including: Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Although the Eighth Circuit originally had additional states situated in the geographic-region, Congress passed legislation which broke the Circuit into 2-separate circuits, which is known as the Tenth Circuit today.

The courthouses in each state are further broken down into regions. The Eastern District court in Arkansas sits in Little Rock and Western District court is in Fort Smith. The Northern District court in Iowa is in Cedar Rapids, and Southern District is in Des Moines, IA. The District of Minnesota court sits in Minneapolis, the Eastern District court is in St. Louis (Appeals court), and Western District is in Kansas City, MO. The District of Nebraska court sits in Omaha. The Northern District court in South Dakota is in Fargo, and Southern District court is in Sioux Falls, SD.

Currently there are 11 active judges on the bench in the Eighth Circuit and 7 senior judges. The Chief Justice is Lavenski Smith, and the Circuit Justice is Neil Gorsuch. A number of precedent-setting decisions have come from the Eighth District. Frosty Treats Inc. v Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. (2005) is one of those cases. In the trademark case, the court held that Frosty Treats (largest US ice cream company) was not “distinctive” or “famous enough” to receive immunity protections from being used in a violent video game.

The National Law Review covers cases such as Frosty v Sony which deal with trademarks and branding, as well as several other categories and case law. Bankruptcy proceedings, tax related cases, government actions, indemnity cases, state actions, appointments, and State and Federal agency news. The National Law Review also covers the latest news pertaining to legislation, patents, election, and general-information in the legal community.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jan
24
2024
Climate Change Litigation – State Tort Cases Move Ahead Blank Rome LLP
May
1
2015
College’s Falsification of Grades and Attendance Records May Trigger FCA Liability Covington & Burling LLP
Oct
10
2011
Common Attornment Provision Held Ineffective After Master Lease and Sublease Rejected in Bankruptcy by Debtor-Sublandlord Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
1
2013
Common Sense Prevails Once Again: District Court False Claims Acts (FCA) Ruling Serves As Reminder That Whistleblowers Need to Prove Recklessness Too Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2016
Company Fights Back Against United States Olympic Committee Katten
Sep
7
2021
Company Using Predictive Dialer Prevails in Post-Facebook Decision Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
20
2017
Company’s Reaction to Claim of Unequal Pay Provides Lessons for Employers Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
15
2015
ConAgra Foods Defeats Challenge to Its Executive Exemption Classification in FLSA Class Action Mintz
Jun
3
2012
Confidentiality concerns don't justify filing unserved privilege log under seal Armstrong Teasdale
Nov
23
2020
Content May Soon Run Out McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
17
2017
Continued Employment Isn’t Always Sufficient – Minnesota Requires Additional Consideration For Non-Compete With Current Employee Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
22
2024
Copyrightability? Think Outside the Checkbox McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
6
2024
COUNTER ATTACK: Alleged Litigator That Supplied Fake Name on Form Facing Fraud Claim in TCPA Suit Troutman Amin, LLP
Nov
30
2021
Court Blocks Implementation of CMS Vaccine Mandate in 10 States Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
26
2019
Court Dismisses Title IX Lawsuit Over University’s Cutting Women’s Ice Hockey Program Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
30
2018
Court Grants Judgment and Injunction in Favor of EEOC In Americans With Disabilities Act Lawsuit: UPS Freight's Policy of Paying Disabled Drivers Less Violates Federal Law, Court Rules U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Feb
14
2020
Court in W.D. Missouri Holds an ATDS Must Have Capacity to Randomly or Sequentially Generate Numbers Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
5
2023
Court Looks at What a Franchise Is Under the Minnesota Franchise Act Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
9
2019
Court Overturns Suspension of Employee Refusing Work Due to Safety Concerns Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
21
2017
Court Reduces Aggregate Award of Statutory Damages Deemed “Obviously Unreasonable and Wholly Disproportionate” Faegre Drinker
May
21
2020
Court Refuses to Enforce “Time-Traveling” Arbitration Clause Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
16
2023
Court Rejects Differing Site Condition Claim for Lack of Timely Notice Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Aug
18
2021
Court Rejects FCRA Preemption Argument in Financial Privacy Litigation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
7
2015
Court Revives “Fraudulent Inducement” FCA Case despite Relators’ Failure to Link False Statement to Government Payment McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
5
2021
Court Stays Within the Four Corners–No Dismissal Despite Compelling Evidence of Consent Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
5
2023
Courts Continue to Grapple with the Causation Standard for False Claims Act Suits Based on Alleged Kickback Schemes, While the Supreme Court Stays on the Sidelines Mintz
Jun
28
2016
Courts Continue To Require That TCPA Classes Be Presently and Readily Ascertainable By Reference To Objective Criteria Faegre Drinker
Dec
2
2021
Courts Grant Preliminary Injunctions Placing CMS Interim Final Rule on Hold Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jul
22
2021
Court’s Dismissal of Data Breach Litigation Reiterates Importance of Strategic, Informed Decisions Early on Regarding Choice of Law and Nuances Among State Laws Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
5
2013
Covenant, Shmovenant? Ten-Year Nationwide Non-Compete in Asset Purchase Agreement Forms the Basis for Tortious Interference With Contract Claim Mintz
Nov
18
2019
Coverage May Exist For Companies Facing Allegations Related To Sexual Abuse Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
16
2019
Covered and Uncovered Claims — When Allocation Is Required Jackson Lewis P.C.
Dec
12
2023
COVID Vaccine Class Action Reminds Employers to Individually Consider Accommodations Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
15
2020
COVID-19 Update: COVID-19 and the Courts: Part II How Appellate Court Procedures Are Changing and What May Be Here to Stay Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Aug
31
2015
Creative Calling Solutions v. LF Beauty -- Eighth Circuit Case Addressing Personal Jurisdiction Arising From Business Relationship With Foreign Company Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
9
2019
Crime Coverage — Who Is an Employee and Who Is an Authorized Representative? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
8
2019
Cross-Plan Offsetting in the Balance: UnitedHealth Group, Inc. Petitions the Supreme Court to Allow Cross-Plan Offsetting; Response to be Filed on or before July 31, 2019 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
11
2021
Cybersecurity Safeguards Implemented by Federal Judiciary for Filing Highly Sensitive Court Documents Faegre Drinker
May
26
2021
D&O Insurer Muted by “Uncertainty” in Contract Exclusion, and “Complicated” Endorsements, in Headphone Manufacturer’s Liability Claim Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
21
2016
D&O Liability: Minnesota Federal Court Dismisses Derivative Lawsuit against Target’s D&Os for Data Breach
Feb
13
2024
Deaf Ramp Agent’s Inability to Communicate With Others While Working Posed ‘Direct Threat’ to Employee Safety, Court Rules Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
8
2016
DeCoster Decision—What Food and Beverage Companies Need To Know Katten
Dec
21
2016
DeCoster Rehearing Denied—Food and Beverage Company Executives Face Risks of Prosecution as Responsible Corporate Officers Katten
Dec
3
2014
Defined Benefit Plan Participants Have Standing to Pursue Fiduciary Breach Claims Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
15
2016
Defined Benefit Plan Participant’s Action Mooted by ERISA Plan’s Improved Financial Condition Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2023
DEI Under Scrutiny, Part III: High Court Wades Into Questions of Whether Title VII Sex Discrimination Requires Material Harm Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
4
2024
DEI Under Scrutiny, Part IV: Could the ‘Background Circumstances’ Rule for Discrimination Be Primed for Supreme Court Review? Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Apr
3
2024
Delay and Disorganization ≠ Failure to Cooperate Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
26
2022
Delay in Enforcing Trademark Measured from When Infringement Became Actionable McDermott Will & Emery
May
7
2014
Delivery Truck Driver was an Independent Contractor, not an Employee, Arkansas Federal Court Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins