Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Feb
4
2014
Judge Batten Grants Summary Judgement to Indiana Mills & Manufacturing against Pediatric Medical Devices Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
16
2019
Federal Circuit Limits Design Patents to Identified Article of Manufacture Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
2
2016
Patent Eligibility: A Response to Rejections Under 35 USC §101 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
19
2016
No Time to Relax for Inflatable Lounger Companies Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
5
2016
Functional Claim Language, USPTO Training & Williamson: A Mechanical Perspective Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
16
2017
State Universities Gain Immunity from IPRs Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
1
2016
Claims Strategies in Patent Applications – Matching or Varied? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
17
2019
State Sovereignty 101: State Universities Not Immune to IPR Proceedings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
29
2014
A Powerful Tool: Challenging Assertion during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
24
2018
Supreme Court Inter Parties Review Decision - SAS INSTITUTE INC. v. IANCU Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
5
2013
Let’s Continue with Insights about Software Patenting Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
15
2013
Patent Eligibility of an Invention Implemented by Computers Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
25
2019
Supreme Court: USPTO Ban on “Offensive” Trademark Registrations Unconstitutional Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
18
2014
Challenging “Obvious to Try” during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
21
2017
Don’t Fall for a Scam: Trademark Owners Targeted Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
5
2013
Patent Practitioners and Writing Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
10
2013
To Collect On Blank Indorsements, Make Sure There Are No Gaps Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
9
2020
Examiner in Ex Parte Patent Prosecution Held to a Lower Standard For Showing “Printed Publication” Than Required of Petitioner in Contested Cases, Like IPRs and PGRs Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
9
2013
E-Commerce, Internet Technology and Novelty Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
3
2013
Federal Circuit Clarifies Test for Obviousness of Design Patents Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
10
2013
Plain Language in Patent Claim Applications Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
28
2019
Walking the Jurisdictional Line: Cashing in on Federal Jurisdiction in Patent Licensing Disputes Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jan
26
2015
Arguing a Post-Alice §101 “Abstract Idea” Rejection during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
15
2017
Updating Interview Scheduling Practices with USPTOs AIR Program Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
29
2013
A Case for Patentability of Software-Based Inventions Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
3
2013
Dissenting Opinions in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
26
2014
EPIC Battle Launched Between Flooring Companies Over Trademark Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jan
9
2024
Industry Reactions to In re Cellect Decision Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
11
2013
Insights About Software Patenting: Cybersource Corp. v. Retail Decisions Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
1
2019
Federal Circuit Says PTAB APJ Appointments Were Unconstitutional – Now What? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jan
4
2012
Court Stays Cross-State Air Pollution Rule ArentFox Schiff LLP
Apr
28
2023
New Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petition on Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from India ArentFox Schiff LLP
Sep
19
2023
Design Patent Obviousness in the Automotive Industry - LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC and the Rosen-Durling Test ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
11
2016
Federal Circuit Rules Lanham Act’s Disparagement Bar Unconstitutional, Creating Circuit Split ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
29
2016
Supreme Court Holds that Decision to Institute IPR is Non-appealable and PTAB’s “Broadest Reasonable Construction” Standard for Claim Construction is Lawful ArentFox Schiff LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins