Mar 15 2016 |
California Employers: Get Ready for New FEHC Regulations Effective April 1st |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 5 2021 |
California Employers Should Be Aware of Updates to Leave Requirements |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 19 2021 |
Statutory Offer To Compromise Void Without Express Acceptance Provision |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 23 2021 |
Changes to CCPA Regulations are Approved and in Effect |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 30 2021 |
California Largely (But Not Fully) Conforms to Deductibility of Expenses Paid with Forgiven PPP Loans |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 11 2017 |
Dancing On Their Own: California Supreme Court’s Decision in McGill v. Citibank, N.A. that Class Action Waivers Do Not Apply to Claims for Public Injunctive Relief under California’s Consumer Protection Laws |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 28 2017 |
Bay Area Local Law Update: Emeryville’s “Fair Workweek Ordinance”; San Francisco Bans Salary History Inquiries; And Additional Accommodations For Lactating Employees |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 8 2017 |
Outlet And Factory Class Actions Take A Hit: California Court of Appeal Confirms Companies Can Sell Made-For-Outlet Product At Outlet Or Factory Stores |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 6 2021 |
New California Law Imposes Moratorium on New Hospice Licenses |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 5 2017 |
A Solution in Search of a Problem: The California Legislature Imposes Duties for Employers When ICE Audits Your I-9s |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 4 2022 |
Cannabis Legislation Year-in-Review |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 22 2018 |
Court Rejects Plaintiffs’ Attempt to Double-Dip in Settlement Pool |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 8 2022 |
Petitioners Failed to Show Subdivision Consistent With a Specific Plan EIR Was Outside the Scope of a Statutory Exemption |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 23 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Clarifies that a Derivative Plaintiff Must Demonstrate Both “Contemporaneous” and “Continuous” Ownership to Maintain a Derivative Suit on Behalf of a Limited Liability Company |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 8 2019 |
2019 is the Year of . . . CCPA? [Infographic] |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 11 2010 |
California Statute Regarding Convenience Checks Not Facially Preempted By Federal Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 25 2010 |
Reminder: San Francisco Minimum Wage Increase for 2011 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 3 2011 |
California's Department of Managed Health Care Announces ACOs Should Expect Licensure Requirement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 28 2019 |
Like a Butterfly, Will the CCPA Continue to Evolve? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 26 2011 |
A Case Where CEQA Worked |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 5 2011 |
Legal Issues Surrounding Social Media Background Checks |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 6 2012 |
Court of Appeal Reminds Litigants That Settling With Named Plaintiff Does Not Necessarily End Putative Class Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 19 2019 |
Court of Appeal Rules HERO Cannot Save Previously Vacated Rental Units |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 18 2013 |
New Court Decision Clarifies California Mechanic's Lien Valuation Statute |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 19 2019 |
What To Do About Employees Under CCPA: An Update |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 2 2013 |
California Commercial Building Owners Must Comply With New Energy Use Disclosure Rules Commencing July 1, 2013 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 13 2013 |
Ninth Circuit Holds that Federal Securities Laws Preempt California Labor Code's Ban on Forced Patronage at Brokerage Firms |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 29 2022 |
CCPA May Soon Apply to Employee and B2B Information |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 10 2013 |
In the wake of the California Supreme Court's Harris Decision, A FEHA Claimant Must Show Discrimination was a "Substantial Motivating Factor" and An Employer Waives its Mixed-Motive Defense by Failing to Assert It in Its Answer |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 1 2019 |
Merger of Adventist-St. Joseph Rejected by the California Attorney General |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 1 2014 |
Are Call Recording Class Actions Doomed in California? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 15 2022 |
CFPB and State Regulators Hone in on Interest-Bearing Crypto Accounts |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 11 2014 |
California Documentary Transfer Tax: Separate Unrecorded Statement of Tax No Longer Allowed After December 31, 2014 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 19 2023 |
California City Flouts Housing Laws, Inviting State Scrutiny |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 2 2014 |
Missing Data Protocols Under California's AB1103 Energy Use Disclosure Rule and Other Important Facts You Need to Know |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |