Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Apr
7
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 7, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
4
2014
Applause Can Come with a Big Price Tag: Michael Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2014
ITC (International Trade Commission) Says the Importation of Digital Data Can Constitute Importation of a Patent-Infringing Product Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
4
2014
Exaggerated Allegations Based on Essentially No Evidence Equals Rule 11 Sanctions: Heller v. Cepia L.L.C. McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2014
Properly Analyzing Breach of a NDA (Non-disclosure Agreement): Loftness Specialized Farm Equip., Inc. v. Twiestmeyer McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2014
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India: An Update Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
4
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 4, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
3
2014
PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Reluctant to Exclude Evidence: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
3
2014
Pre-America Invents Act Litigation Triggers Time Bar for Inter Partes Review: Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
3
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 3, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
2
2014
Non-Direct Competitors May Sue Under the Lanham Act, Doctrine of Prudential Standing Eliminated McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2014
Evidence in Support of Petition for Venue Transfer Must Be Sufficiently Specific McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2014
Prosecution History of Original Examination as Intrinsic Evidence in Post-Grant Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2014
Data-Encryption Is Patent Eligible Despite Not Being Tied to a Particular Machine McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2014
No “Second Bite at the Apple” for Non-Petitioner Defendants Seeking Stay Based on Pending Inter Partes Review (IPR) McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2014
Supreme Court Granted Cert In Teva V. Sandoz (“April Fool” Lightning Ballast!) Re: Patent Litigation
Apr
2
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 2, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
2
2014
Divisional Practice in the BRICs and other Countries – Part 9 of a 9-Part Series: A Comprehensive Summary Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
2
2014
Data Transaction Claim Not Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
1
2014
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Releases Examination Guidelines for Determining Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
1
2014
No Foreseeability Bar to The Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents Re: Intellectual Property McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
1
2014
Complaint Asserts Copyright Infringement over Hardwood Floor Pattern on Vinyl Wallcovering Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
1
2014
Old World Christmas Seeks to Protect Alpine Skier Nutcracker Re: Copyright Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
1
2014
Apparatus for Delivering a Patent Application on April 1 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
1
2014
Supreme Court Oral Arguments – Can Alice Get Out Of “Wonderland”?
Apr
1
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 1, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
1
2014
Supreme Court Arguments in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank – Going between Scylla and Charybdis? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
31
2014
Messages on Government Officials’ Personal Devices and Private Accounts Not Subject to California Public Records Act Jackson Lewis P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins