Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Dec
3
2019
Court to Consider Whether California Ride Share Drivers Who Make Airport Runs Are Exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
11
2018
Court Finds ACLA Claims Precluded, CMS PAMA Rules Stand Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
27
2023
New Jersey Appellate Division Qualifies Longstanding Arbitration Requirement That Waiver of Court Relief Must Be Express Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
24
2018
California Court of Appeal Rejects Dynamex’s “ABC” Test for Independent Contractors for Claims That Do Not Arise Under a Wage Order Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Nov
28
2020
Federal Judges Parody Hamilton in Musical Lament to (Renewed) Jury Trial Delay Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
21
2023
Court Unanimously Holds That IDEA Administrative Remedy Requirements Do Not Preclude Compensatory Damages Under ADA: SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jan
19
2021
California Supreme Court Concludes That Dynamex Applies Retroactively Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jan
21
2021
The Harsh Reality of the “Trial Penalty” in Federal Prosecutions Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sep
18
2017
Federal Laws Do Not Preempt Connecticut Law Providing Employment Protections to Medical Marijuana Users Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jan
14
2022
SCOTUS Permits CMS Health Care Vax Rule but Rejects OSHA Vax-or-Test ETS for Large Employers Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
25
2020
New NLRB Rule Defining Joint-Employer Status to Take Effect Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sep
11
2015
2012 Breach and Lacking Compliance Program Results in $750,000 Settlement for Radiation Oncology Group Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sep
14
2015
$750,000 HIPAA Settlement Reinforces Need to Be Proactive Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
26
2020
Personal Jurisdiction in a Time of Social Distancing Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Nov
1
2017
Illinois Experiences Surge of Lawsuits Regarding Biometric Information Privacy Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
24
2022
The Court Rules That Lack of Factual or Legal Knowledge Can Excuse Copyright Registration Error: SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Nov
13
2017
Department of Labor Appeals Ruling Striking the 2016 Overtime Rule, then Obtains Stay Halting its Appeal Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
4
2019
Seventh Circuit Holds External Job Applicants Cannot Pursue Disparate Impact Claims Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
15
2019
Sixth Circuit Greenlights Employer’s Broad Attorney Fee Provision Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
26
2015
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly — The Newly Proposed USCIS STEM OPT Regulations Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
4
2022
The Pros – and Cons – of Arbitration Agreements with Class Action Waivers Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
21
2022
Supreme Court Decides Five Cases, Some of Which Lay Down Markers That Could Impact Future Decisions: SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
May
18
2022
What to Do When You Have to Give a Deposition for Your Employer Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
12
2018
Wisconsin Supreme Court Strikes Down Co-Worker Non-Solicitation Clause Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
May
23
2022
Court Holds That Judges Can’t Invent Rules Governing Arbitration Waiver and Makes It Harder for Prisoners to Show Ineffective Assistance: SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Aug
9
2023
California Court of Appeal Holds That Unexpected Work Expenses May Be Reimbursable Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
23
2018
The Supreme Court Holds That Federal Courts Must Interpret Collective Bargaining Agreements in Accordance with “Ordinary Contract Principles;” Rejects So-Called “Yard-Man” Inferences Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
8
2022
Another California Board Diversity Statute Struck Down in Court: Appeal to Be Filed Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins