Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
2
2017
Foreign Investment in the United States: Don’t Let CFIUS Unwind Your Deal! Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
1
2020
Court Of Chancery Orders Specific Performance Of Merger Agreement, Finding That Fraud Contained In FDA Filings For Approval Of Target Product Did Not Rise To A “Material Adverse Effect” K&L Gates
Nov
29
2022
Buyer Beware: Delaware Court of Chancery Declines to Blue-Pencil Restrictive Covenant in M&A Transaction Robinson & Cole LLP
Sep
5
2014
NLRB General Counsel Announces Broad Interpretation of Joint Employer Status Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Dec
7
2022
Tech M&A Outlook: What Types of Deals are Getting Done? Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
21
2020
Poison Pills, NOL Poison Pills and the COVID-19 Pandemic Robinson & Cole LLP
Mar
3
2022
How Is International Franchising Affected by China’s Personal Information and Data Compliance Regime? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Dec
15
2022
Litigation Minute: Year in Review—Trending Topics Across the 2022 Litigation Spectrum K&L Gates
Feb
5
2014
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Provides No-Action Relief for M&A (Mergers and Acquisition) Brokers Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
8
2013
Corporate Governance Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions ArentFox Schiff LLP
Oct
12
2023
Implications of DOJ’s New Safe Harbor for Disclosing Misconduct Uncovered During M&A Transactions Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
8
2014
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Issues No-action Relief Regarding Registration of Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Brokers Katten
Dec
14
2018
Energy & Sustainability M&A Activity – December 2018 Mintz
Oct
16
2023
DOJ Incentivizes Voluntary Self-Disclosure in New Safe Harbor Policy for Mergers & Acquisitions K&L Gates
Jan
5
2023
Congress Enacts Major Overhaul to HSR Filing Fees for M&A Deals Bracewell LLP
Mar
20
2013
The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive – How Does It Affect Non-EU Managers? Katten
Oct
7
2014
California Supreme Court Finds Franchisor Not Vicariously Liable for Sexual Harassment Jackson Lewis P.C.
Sep
27
2017
New Rules Offer Clarity On China's Outbound M&A Crackdown Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
20
2023
DOJ Unveils Voluntary Self-Disclosure Safe Harbor for M&A Deals McDermott Will & Emery
May
7
2020
Does the Coronavirus Change the Material Adverse Event Clause for Mergers & Acquisitions? Mintz
Oct
10
2014
Understanding Stock Versus Asset sale Agreements McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Mar
25
2022
Accounting in M&A Deals – Navigating the Numbers Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
10
2023
Get Your Restaurant Business Fit to Transact in 2023 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
4
2015
The Legacy of the RadioShack Bankruptcy and the Importance of PII Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
2
2023
Energy & Sustainability M&A Activity — November 2023 Mintz
Apr
4
2022
Energy & Sustainability M&A Activity — April 2022 Mintz
Apr
10
2013
Delaware and California Courts Split as to Whether a Reverse Triangular Merger Results In an Assignment By Operation of Law, Creating Potential Pitfalls for Delaware and Other Foreign Corporations Located in California Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2022
Don’t White-Knuckle Withdrawal Liability Jackson Lewis P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins