Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jun
2
2015
Class Certification Requires an “F-Bomb” - Be First, Be Firm, and Be Focused. IMS Legal Strategies
Dec
15
2014
Clear Sailing Ahead For Class Counsel in California Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
5
2020
Clearing the Air On Talc – How Sound Science Must Guide Jurors In the Talc Litigation CMBG3 Law
Apr
8
2019
Clearing Things Up: Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Clears up Difference Between Claim Lacking Merit and Court Lacking Jurisdiction Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
18
2020
Client Alert: An Introduction to the Doctrines of Impossibility and Frustration of Purpose Sherin and Lodgen LLP
Dec
29
2015
Close Call on Daubert Question re: Admissibility of Expert Witness Testimony Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
16
2013
Closing the HAMPer II: North Carolina Court Allows Common Law Claims to Proceed and There's Some Mention of HAMP in the Decision too Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
28
2013
Closing Time for Anheuser-Busch, the NLRB Adopts a Balancing Test When Unions Request Witness Statements Southern Methodist University, SMU Dedman School of Law
Jul
26
2020
Co-Trustees Can Sue To Remove A Co-Trustee Due To Hostility Winstead
Dec
23
2013
Coast to Coast Noncompete Part 2: Still Going in 3 Courts in 2 States Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
20
2012
Coca-Cola Hit with a $21 Million Distracted Driving Judgment Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
Jul
30
2021
Coffee “or” Tea? Is That Coffee or Tea, but Not Both? Or Possibly Both? Finnegan
Apr
17
2020
Coincidentally Timely – New Jersey Appellate Division’s New Guidance Permitting Remote Testimony at Trial Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Collective and Class Actions: Interns, Assistant Managers-- and Their Lawyers! Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
22
2021
Colonial Pipeline Moves to Dismiss Cybersecurity Litigation and Moves to Strike Class: Will the Court Kick Plaintiff’s Claims? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
13
2015
Colorado Court Breaks from Current Precedent in E-Discovery Cost Award Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Sep
1
2021
Combating Whistleblower Retaliation: How to Maximize Your Recovery Zuckerman Law
Apr
1
2013
Comcast v. Behrend Sets a Higher Bar for Class Certification Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
4
2013
Comcast v. Behrend Strikes Again: Supreme Court Vacates and Remands Ross v. RBS Citizens, N.A. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
3
2013
Comcast v. Behrend’s Impact Already Being Felt: Supreme Court Vacates and Remands Whirlpool v. Glazer for Reconsideration Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
22
2015
Comedian Bill Cosby’s Wife Moves to Quash Federal Civil Subpoena Stark & Stark
Feb
19
2014
Comity and Commonality: A Tale of Two Identical Class Actions Brought By Forum-Shopping Plaintiffs’ Counsel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
11
2013
Comments on Recent Changes to the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
2
2013
Comments on Web Pages Not Sufficiently Reliable For Cross-Examination Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
10
2019
Commercial Division Denies Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Serve Complaint After Plaintiff LLC Failed to Appear Through Counsel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2014
Commercial Division Justices Oing and Scarpulla Participate In New Pilot Program Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2022
Commercial Division to Adopt New Rule Requiring Interlineation of Responsive Pleadings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2014
Commercial Litigators in Virginia: Ask for Permission Before Using Technologies in the Courtroom Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
May
6
2022
Common Law™ v. Federally Registered® Trademark Rights Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jun
25
2021
Common Mistakes to Avoid When Appealing a North Carolina Occupational Licensing Board Decision Ward and Smith, P.A.
Jan
17
2023
Commonwealth Court Strikes Down 2021 Accessibility Regulations as Unconstitutional - Pennsylvania Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, P.C.
Apr
5
2024
Commonwealth Financial Network Must Pay $72 Million in SEC Enforcement Action ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jul
21
2021
Company Names vs. Trade Names: Understanding the Legal Difference Ward and Smith, P.A.
Jun
10
2023
Comparing New York State’s Court Rule Governing Entity Depositions to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
May
14
2020
Compelled to Testify: Court of Appeal Confirms Power to Order Non Party Witness to Give Evidence in a New York-Seated Arbitration K&L Gates
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins