Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization
Apr
24
2012
Seventh Circuit Decision May Spur Limited Revival of HAMP Claims Against Loan Servicers Much Shelist, P.C.
Apr
24
2012
Disclosure of EU Leniency Materials: English High Court Outlines the Boundaries of Document Disclosure McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
21
2012
Case Study: Pyro Spectaculars v. Souza Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
21
2012
Michigan Court of Appeals Rules Lenders May Not Foreclose a Mortgage by Advertisement While Filing Suit Against Guarantors Varnum LLP
Apr
20
2012
Federal Appeals Court Enjoins Implementation of NLRB’s Private Sector Posting Rule ArentFox Schiff LLP
Apr
19
2012
Supreme Court Applies “Machine-or-Transformation Test” to Diagnostic Patents Vedder Price
Apr
19
2012
Caraco v. Novo Nordisk (Prandin®): Federal Circuit Reversed in Patent Use Code Case Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
18
2012
Since DOJ Won’t Confess Error, It’s Time for Others to Stay on the Case Ifrah Law
Apr
17
2012
EDMO case addressing waiver of privilege by claim of ineffective assistance postponed Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
16
2012
Federal District Court Finds Jurisdiction Exists over Foreign Parent in Pension Plan Liability Suit McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
16
2012
U.S. District Court for The Eastern District of New York Gives Priortiy to Forum Selection Clause Over Prior Arbitration Agreement Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
16
2012
California Employers Have No Duty to Ensure Employees Do Not Work During Meal Breaks: Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court Mintz
Apr
15
2012
Reexamination Appeals: Go Directly to Fed. Circuit, Do Not Pass Dist. Court McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
15
2012
Federal Circuit Continues to Hone in on What Constitutes Patentable Subject Matter Post-Bilski Vedder Price
Apr
15
2012
English Tribunal Confirms Litigation Privilege Can Apply in Competition Authority Investigations McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
14
2012
California Supreme Court Clarifies Meal and Rest Break Obligations Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
13
2012
Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. Superior Ct.: The Takeaway on Meal and Rest Period Rules and Claims Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
12
2012
The All “Reasonable Manners” of Depiction Standard Rejected in Trademark Examinations, as Well as Oppositions McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
12
2012
Fourth Circuit Resurrects Rosetta Stone’s Challenge to Google’s AdWords Program Mintz
Apr
11
2012
'Round the Turn They're A-Comin'! The Wild Patent Enforcement Ride of Marine Polymer v. HemCon Bracewell LLP
Apr
11
2012
Inartful Pleading Does Not Defeat Duty to Defend Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Apr
10
2012
Ninth Circuit Strictly Applies Alea and Woo to Bar Insurer From Making Duty to Defend Determination Based Upon Undisputed Extrinsic Evidence Not Relevant to Underlying Claim Williams Kastner
Apr
8
2012
In Absence of Express Policy Requirement, No Examination Under Oath - EUO Pre-Requisite to Insured Filing Bad Faith Suit Williams Kastner
Apr
8
2012
Supreme Court Broadens the Types of Federal Agency Actions That Can Be Challenged in Court Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
8
2012
Interference Time Bar Can Flex McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
7
2012
Court Reaffirms Broad Immunity for Patent Infringing Government Contractors - Only Recourse For Patent Holders Is To Sue Government Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
6
2012
FERC Upholds Postage Stamp Cost Allocation Methodology Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
6
2012
Is Subject-Matter Eligibility Really a Threshold Issue? McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
6
2012
D. C. District Court Trumps EPA on Clean Water Act Permitting Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
5
2012
No Independent Analysis—No Preliminary Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
3
2012
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Marbury Lives! Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
3
2012
The BankAtlantic Bancorp Decision — Roadblock or Detour to Open Bank Sale of Distressed Banks? ArentFox Schiff LLP
Apr
2
2012
Award of Attorneys’ Fees in Copyright Cases Not Beholden to Lodestar Method McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2012
Can't Touch This - Supreme Court Finds Personalized Medicine Patent Claims Invalid Bracewell LLP
Apr
1
2012
Second Circuit Clarifies Elements of a Domestic Securities Transaction Under Morrison v. National Australia Bank Bracewell LLP
Mar
31
2012
United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: “Just Say No to ‘CRACKBERRY’” McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2012
Patent Claims Must Recite “Significantly More” than a Law of Nature McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2012
Legal Challenge To “ObamaCare” Threatens Generic Biologicals Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
29
2012
FTC Petitions for Rare Supreme Court Review of Hospital Acquisition Mintz
Mar
27
2012
Slogans versus substance in the battle over ObamaCare's future: ANALYSIS Center for Public Integrity
Mar
26
2012
Supreme Court Remands In Myriad Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
23
2012
Loser Pays Most Electronic Discovery Costs? Not So Fast Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
21
2012
A Sharply Divided En Banc Federal Circuit Decision Limits Intervening Rights To Claims Textually Modified in Reexamination Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
21
2012
U.S. Supreme Court Issues Decision in Mayo v. Prometheus Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
20
2012
Supreme Court Reverses In Prometheus v. Mayo! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
19
2012
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter in Business Method Patents—Fort Properties v. American Master, MySpace v. Graphon Corp. and the Murky, Treacherous Waters of Abstract Ideas Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
18
2012
Contractual Non-Reliance Clauses: Insulating Defendants from Civil Fraud Claims Since 1995 Much Shelist, P.C.
Mar
17
2012
Oregon Court of Appeals Refuses to Apply Liability Limits Increase Retroactively Williams Kastner
Mar
16
2012
One Year Rule Bars Interference with an Issued Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
15
2012
The Value of Project Management: Avoiding a “Huge Hole” in your E-Discovery Process Exterro Inc.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins