Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Dec
6
2016
Away Game: Canadian Supreme Court Allows Superior Court Judges to Determine Settlement Motions Outside of their Home Provinces Mintz
May
2
2024
Back in the USA: Seventh Circuit Lifts Sanctions, Anti-Suit Injunction Contempt McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2013
Background Information Can Be Critical to Obviousness Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
May
10
2023
Bacon and a Heavy Burden: Significant Contribution Required To Be a Joint Inventor Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Apr
26
2022
Badgerow v. Walters: Supreme Court Holds that “look through” Approach Does not Apply to Requests to Confirm or Vacate Arbitral Awards Under the FAA Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
30
2014
Balancing Venue, Transfer Factors at the Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
15
2022
Ballast in Litigation Privilege: Commercial Court Finds No Privilege in Expert’s Investigations but No Waiver of Privilege in Solicitor’s Witness Statement Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
9
2024
Bank Groups Sue to Overturn New Community Lending Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
5
2010
Bank Had No Duty to Advise Business Charge Card Owner that Bank had Obtained Judgment Against a Person Who Was Authorized to Use the Card Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
6
2010
Bank Not Liable In Nigerian-Style Email Scam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
30
2014
Bank of America, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures I and II LLC: Denying Motion to Limit Deposition Time Limit Faegre Drinker
Jan
17
2023
Bankruptcy Court Allows Service of a Subpoena Via Twitter Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
8
2022
Bankruptcy Legislation Update: Senate Passes Bill Preserving $7.5 Million Eligibility Threshold for Subchapter V ArentFox Schiff LLP
Oct
5
2021
Bankruptcy Venue “Reform” – What Are The Odds This Time? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
6
2014
Barclays Motion to Dismiss Claims Raises Significant Issues About FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) Jurisdiction Bracewell LLP
Feb
17
2022
Bargained-Away Rights to File for IPR May Not Be Recovered McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
17
2015
Bate v. Greenwich Insurance Co. - Important Missouri Supreme Court Case re Service of Process on an Insurance Company Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
2
2020
Bay Area Counties Implement Updated Shelter-in-Place Orders with April 2 Deadline for Compliance Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
14
2010
Be Careful What You Ask For: Costs of Issuing Broad Subpoena May Significantly Outweigh Benefits in NC Poyner Spruill LLP
Feb
4
2014
Be Careful What You Draw: Prosecution History Estoppel Applies to Design Patents - Pacific Coast Marine v. Malibu Boats, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2021
Be Careful What You Offer in Your Next Offer of Judgment! Pierce Atwood LLP
Apr
16
2015
Be Careful What You Say—It Might End Up in a Declaration to Defeat Summary Judgment Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
5
2014
Be Prepared for Expedited Union Elections Under Proposed New Rules von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Aug
4
2015
Be Very Careful If You Are Instructing Your Clients Not To Answer Questions At A Deposition Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP
Sep
22
2011
Behavior Modification: Trial Lawyer's Edition Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
4
2019
Behind the Trial Podcast with U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California [PODCAST] McKool Smith
Mar
18
2014
Behind “Obnoxious” Headlines, A Good Noncompete Strategy Reminder Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
26
2020
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Affirms Invalidation of Van Cleef & Arpels’ Chinese 3D Jewelry Trademark Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
10
2020
Belgium – when contractual cherry-picking may be fruitless Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
21
2024
Beltway Buzz, April 19, 2024 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
31
2020
Beltway Buzz, January 31, 2020 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
5
2021
Beltway Buzz, March 5, 2021 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Oct
9
2020
Beltway Buzz, October 9, 2020 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
4
2023
Best Case Management Software: Why Every Law Firm Needs Legal Case Management Tools Hennessey Digital
Aug
11
2010
Best Pleading Practices in Federal Court Following Twombly and Iqbal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins