| Mar 12 2014 |
Class Actions in Italy: Milan Court of Appeal Adopts Wider Interpretation of Admissibility |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Mar 12 2014 |
Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) Seeks Opinion Regarding Appearances By Non-Attorneys and Out-of-State Attorneys |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
| Mar 12 2014 |
Better Call Saul -- Human Resources and Damage Control |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
| Mar 10 2014 |
Stock Options and Employee Benefits |
Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C. |
| Mar 9 2014 |
Chief Judge Maloney Reports on State of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Varnum LLP |
| Mar 9 2014 |
Variability in Consumer Experience Dooms Class Action |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Mar 5 2014 |
Be Prepared for Expedited Union Elections Under Proposed New Rules |
von Briesen & Roper, s.c. |
| Mar 3 2014 |
Absolute Pollution Exclusion Still Unenforceable in Indiana |
Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP |
| Mar 3 2014 |
Illinois Court of Appeals Affirms Trial Court in Allowing Expert to Testify |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Mar 2 2014 |
Arbitration Proceeding Do Not Trigger One-Year Statute of Limitations for Inter Partes Review |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Mar 1 2014 |
Are Call Recording Class Actions Doomed in California? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Mar 1 2014 |
Limiting Statutes of Limitations in Arbitration Agreements |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
| Feb 28 2014 |
Second Circuit Reinforces Tough Predatory Pricing Pleading Standards—Can Anyone Properly Plead a Predatory Pricing Claim? |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Feb 28 2014 |
Former Lance Armstrong Endorsement of Supplement Company FRS Doesn’t Support False Advertising Class Action, California Federal Court Rules |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Feb 28 2014 |
Non-Practicing Entities' (NPE) Tough Talk Promising Litigation Against Comcast Becomes Self-fulfilling Prophecy |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Feb 28 2014 |
Strategy of Offering Refunds to Moot Class Actions Gains Traction |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Feb 28 2014 |
France Finally Embraces Class Actions |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Copyright Registration Does Not Trigger the Statute of Limitation for a Co-Authorship Claim: Brownstein v. Lindsay |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Once Again Affirms That Malicious Actions To Destroy A Competitor Do Not State An Antitrust Claim Unless Accompanied By Injury To Competition |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Paper Company, Arguing that FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) Lacks Jurisdiction over Demand Response, Files Motion to Dismiss FERC Manipulation Action |
Bracewell LLP |
| Feb 27 2014 |
Can a Consumer Products Company Moot Class Actions by Offering a Refund? |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
| Feb 26 2014 |
Declaratory Judgment Dismissed Without Prejudice Does Not Bar Later IPR (Inter Partes Review): Clio USA, Inc. v. The Procter and Gamble Company |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 26 2014 |
Expert Testimony Not Required for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claim, Tennessee Court Rules |
Jackson Lewis P.C. |
| Feb 26 2014 |
California Courts Tackle Meaning of “May” Under the Finance Lenders Law |
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP |
| Feb 25 2014 |
When 30 Days Just Isn’t Enough: The Ninth Circuit Rules that Defendants’ Right to Remove May Not be Limited to 30 Days |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 25 2014 |
Forum Selection Clauses and Non-Compete Agreements |
Faegre Drinker |
| Feb 25 2014 |
Delaware Chancery Court Declines to Apply Offer-of-Judgment Rule in Appraisal Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 24 2014 |
De Novo Review of District Court Claim Construction Is Here to Stay—For Now |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Feb 24 2014 |
Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
| Feb 24 2014 |
Lightning Ballast II – Judge Lourie Tries to Get to “The Facts of the Matter” Re: Intellectual Property Litigation |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
| Feb 21 2014 |
2, 4, 6, 8…NFL Cheerleaders Not “Rah Rah-ing” About Pay Rate |
Mintz |
| Feb 21 2014 |
Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions: Who Speaks for the Company? |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP |
| Feb 20 2014 |
A Virginia Bill to Expedite Judicial Decisions in Civil Cases |
Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C. |
| Feb 19 2014 |
Comity and Commonality: A Tale of Two Identical Class Actions Brought By Forum-Shopping Plaintiffs’ Counsel |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
| Feb 19 2014 |
Georgia Jury Left To Decide If Camouflage Patterns Have Specific Protectable Elements Re: Georgia IP Litigation |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
