Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Dec
24
2015
Acxiom Corp. v. Phoenix Licensing, LLC: Bare Allegations of Customer Indemnification Not Enough for CBM Standing McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
5
2016
Acxiom Corp. v. Phoenix Licensing: Denying Institution because Petitioner Found to Lack Standing CBM2015-00180 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2015
Acxiom Corp. v. Phoenix Licensing: Institution Denied Where Customer Indemnification Insufficient to Establish Standing as Real Party in Interest CBM2015-00134 Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2015
Acxiom Corporation v. Phoenix Licensing: Denying Covered Business Method Patent Review Because Petitioner Did Not Have Standing CBM2015-00068 Faegre Drinker
Nov
13
2018
Adapting the Law for Automotive Automation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
26
2020
Adding Initials to a Surname Does Not Necessarily Create a Protected Trademark Mintz
Jun
18
2011
Adding Only Dependent Claims Is Error Correctible By Reissue McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
31
2016
Adding Pre-Existing Technology Won’t Save a Patent-Ineligible Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
13
2020
Adding “.com” to Generic Term May Open Route to Trademark Protection According to Supreme Court Davis|Kuelthau, s.c.
Apr
21
2014
Adding “Computer” to Software Method Does Not Make It Patentable McDermott Will & Emery
May
18
2015
Additional Discovery In Inter Partes Reviews—Absolutely No Fishing Allowed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
28
2015
Additional Discovery Scrutinized by PTAB for Scope and Purpose McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
7
2016
Additional Intellectual Property Considerations in Light of Brexit Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jan
3
2019
Adequacy of Explanation Remains Key Area of PTAB Reversal Brinks Gilson & Lione
Dec
9
2010
Adjusting the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine: Federal Circuit Hears Oral Arguments En Banc in Therasense Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2020
Adjusting to Alice: USPTO Report analyzes patent examination outcomes after Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
28
2020
Adjusting to Alice: USPTO’s View of Its Examination Guidelines Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
1
2013
Administration Launches Strategy on Mitigating Theft of U.S. Trade Secrets McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2016
Administrative Law Judge Lord Grants Another Summary Determination of Section 101 Invalidity Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
2
2020
Administrative Patent Judges – You’re Fired (At Will and Without Cause) McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
24
2015
Administrative Trademark Decisions May Preclude Infringement Litigation Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
8
2020
Admonition To Members Of The Healthcare Industry: Don’t Give Trade Secret Protection The Short Shrift! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
30
2015
Adobe Systems and Level 3 Comm v. Afluo: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable as Anticipated IPR2014-00154 Faegre Drinker
May
22
2014
Adobe Systems Inc. and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Afluo, LLC Denying Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing of Decision on Institution IPR2014-00154 Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2015
Adobe Systems Incorporated and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Afluo, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00153 Faegre Drinker
Sep
25
2014
Adobe Systems Land Level 3 Communications v. Afluo, LLC: Denying Motion to Strike IPR 2014-00153, 154 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale
Mar
11
2013
Adverse Inference Based on Destruction of Computer Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2016
Advertisement and Subsidy Program Qualifies as Financial Product or Service Under Broad CBM Definition McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
7
2015
Advertising Alone Does Not Demonstrate Use of a Service Mark in Commerce for Purposes of Obtaining a Federal Registration Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Jun
18
2020
Advertising Falls within Commercial Activity Exception to Sovereign Immunity McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
12
2019
Adverts must avoid harmful gender stereotypes Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
12
2021
Advice: Delay Filing Chinese Design Patents Until June 1, 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
9
2020
Advocacy vs. Candor Paves the Road to Inequitable Conduct Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
18
2013
Advocate General Jääskinen Gives Georgetown University SPC (Supplementary Protection Certificate) Opinion McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins