Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
5
2017
Shire’s Granted Motion to Amend Offers Additional Insight Into PTAB Amendment Practice Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
10
2017
Is the Halo Broken Already? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
5
2021
Legal Digital Transformation – Lesson #1: Digital Transformation is a Never-Ending Mode of Operation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
24
2017
Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2021
Legal Digital Transformation – Lesson #2: Externalizing Manual Work is Not Digital Transformation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2021
China’s Ministry of Public Security Releases Discusses Status of Intellectual Property Criminal Investigations and Lists Typical Cases of Public Security Agencies Cracking Down on Crimes of Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
25
2021
China Releases Transition Measures for Amended Patent Law Going Into Effect June 1, 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2021
USPTO Publishes Interim Process for Director’s Review of PTAB Decisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
28
2021
Chemours Co. v. Daikin Industries – Back to Some IP Basics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
15
2017
District Court Finding of Ineligible Subject Matter Reversed in VISUAL MEMORY LLC v. NVIDIA CORPORATION August 15, 2017 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
27
2015
Myriad Settles – Questions Remain re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
7
2021
Xiaoi Robot Seeks Preliminary Injunction Against Apple in Shanghai Patent Infringement Suit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
29
2021
Chinese Patent Office Closure Dates – 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
9
2015
Universities Response to Patent “Reform” Legislation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2021
USPTO Sanctions Chinese Trademark Agency by Terminating Over 15,000 U.S. Trademark Applications For Egregious Misconduct in Defrauding the USPTO Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
10
2022
Novartis v. Accord – No Limits on Negative Limitations? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2022
Qualcomm v. Apple – Pyrrhic Victory for Qualcomm? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
7
2011
Google Seeks to Acquire Nortel Patents for $900M Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
19
2011
Apple Sues Samsung Over Galaxy Products Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
18
2022
European Union Challenges China at the WTO Over Anti-Suit Injunctions Preventing Patent Holders from Asserting Their Rights Outside of China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
5
2017
Should the Australian Patent Office be denying patent eligibility to cDNA inventions? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
7
2022
China Releases Summary of Holdings of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court (2021) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
10
2011
Nonanalogous Art Lives! In Re Klein Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
20
2017
So, you are telling me there is a chance? PTAB Finds Anti-Fraud Idea Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
18
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Issues Judicial Interpretation of Anti-Unfair Competition Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2022
China Releases Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Protection by China Customs in 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2022
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Enforcement for 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
8
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate & Ministry of Public Security Jointly Issue Typical Cases Involving Obstructing Epidemic Prevention Including Two Trademark Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
16
2011
Powell v. Home Depot – False Petition Not “Egregious Misconduct” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
26
2022
Vans Wins Triple Punitive Damages in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
31
2022
King Semi Settles Chinese Criminal Trade Secret Case for 60 Million RMB Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2022
Five-Year Prison Sentence for Selling $1.27 Million USD of Counterfeit Armani Watches in Shanghai Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
31
2022
China to Remove Infringing Pharmaceuticals from Procurement Platforms Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
5
2023
5-Month Criminal Detention Sentence for Legal Representative of Chinese IP Agency for Forging TM Documents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
7
2018
USPTO Posts slides for new examiner training on Section 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins