Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
12
2014
Pharmatech Solutions, Inc. v. LifeScan Scotland Ltd.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00247 Faegre Drinker
Aug
12
2014
Patent Practitioners: Inventions and the Ecosystem of Ideas Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
12
2014
Sham Hatch-Waxman Infringement Suits And FDA Citizen Petitions; A Potential For New Liability For Innovators? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2014
Landry's Inc. v. Flores: NLRB Ruling Bucks Trend, Hints that Non-Infringement Provisions in Employee Handbooks may be Lawful Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Aug
11
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 11, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
11
2014
MHRA creates new expert advisory group on medical devices Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
8
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 8, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
8
2014
Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc.: Granting Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery and Denying Motion for Extension of Time IPR2014-00245 Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Authorization to File a Third Corrected Petition IPR2014-00660 Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
SAP America Inc. v. Clouding IP, LLC: Request for Rehearing on Institution IPR2014-00299 Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
Copyright Ownership is not Monkey Business: Wikimedia and Slater Fight Over Selfie Photographs Mintz
Aug
7
2014
3D-Matrix, Ltd. v. Menicon Co., Ltd., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00398 Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
Funkadelic Master Sound Recordings Can Be Involuntarily Transferred to a Court-Appointed Receiver to Satisfy Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
7
2014
Final Written Decision: Veeam Software Corporation v. Symantec Corporation Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
Sixth Circuit Affirms the Importance of Identifying Protected Elements of Copyrighted Software McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
7
2014
Fed. Cir.: Antitrust Issues Can Arise From Hatch-Waxman Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
7
2014
Tesla Successfully Resolves Chinese Trademark Dispute Mintz
Aug
7
2014
FourSquare Labs, Inc. v. Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc.: Granting in Part and Denying in Part Request for Rehearing on Institution IPR2014-00159 Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
Judge Posner Solves Sherlock Holmes Copyright Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
7
2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc., Epsilon Data Management, LLC, and Constant Contact, Inc. v. RPost Communications Limited: Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
Stop the Music (or Be Vicariously Liable) McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
7
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 7, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
7
2014
Sarbanes–Oxley (SOX) Claim Dismissed: Rejection of IP Assignment Clause Not Protected Activity Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
7
2014
Apple Inc. v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Dynamic Advances, LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision on Institution IPR2014-00319 Faegre Drinker
Aug
6
2014
Northern District of Georgia Hears Patent Dispute Erupts Over Mobile Digital Recording Devices Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
6
2014
Trade-Marks In Canada: Proper Use & Maintenance Dickinson Wright PLLC
Aug
6
2014
LaRose Industries, LLC Files First Petition for Post-Grant Review Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
6
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 6, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
5
2014
Per Second Circuit; Full Text Searchable Database Is Fair Use: Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. HathiTrust, et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
5
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 6 of a 10-Part Series: Europe Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
5
2014
Facebook, Inc. v. Rembrandt Social Media, L.P., Granting Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00415 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2014
The Aereo Crashed: Cheap Internet TV Thwarted: American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
5
2014
Federal Circuit Smokes Cuban Entity on Standing Issue: Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco (d/b/a Cubatabaco) v. General Cigar Co., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
5
2014
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited, Denying Leave to File Motion to Stay IPR2014-00357 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 5, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
4
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.: Denying Motion for Additional Pages for Petitioner Reply Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2014
Pattern of Functional Dots in Absorbent Pad Functional? It’s a Fact Issue: McAirlaids, Inc. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
4
2014
TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.: Denying Authorization to File a Motion to Disqualify, Motion to Present Live Demo, and Motion to Expunge Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2014
The Eighth Circuit Weighs In on Trademark Licenses as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Lewis Bros. Bakeries, Inc. v. Interstate Brands Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
4
2014
Ignorance is Bliss – for Teva re: Structural Obviousness in Patent Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
4
2014
Subaru, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., American Honda, Inc., Nissan North America, Inc., Ford Motor, Jaguar Land Rover, LLC, and Volvo Cars, LLC v. Cruise Control Technologies LLC: Patent Owner Motion for Rehearing of Decision to Institute Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Issues First Precedential Opinion Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
4
2014
Cert Alert: Is Trademark Tacking a Fact Issue or Legal Issue? McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
4
2014
Veeam Software Corporation v. Symantec Corporation, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00150 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 4, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
4
2014
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Is Unimpressed by Unsupported Attorney Argument McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2014
Veeam Software Corporation v. Symantec Corporation, Final Written Decision (FWD) Addressing Motion to Amend (MA) IPR2013-00143 Faegre Drinker
Aug
3
2014
Cert Alert: Is the Trademark Trial and Appeal Bound (TTAB) Decision on Likelihood of Confusion Preclusive? McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2014
EcoWater Systems LLC v. Culligan International Co., Inter Partes Review Still Difficult for Patent Owners McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2014
Registrability and Enforceability -- Look Beyond the Register to Determine Scope of Trademark Rights Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins