Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jul
29
2014
Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00746, Arris Group, Inc. v. C-Cation Technologies, LLC Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2014
Westlake Services, LLC d/b/a Westlake Financial Services v. Credit Acceptance Corp.: Denying Authorization to File Motion for Additional Discovery CBM2014-00008 Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2014
Inter Partes Review Appeals: What You Need to Know [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
29
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 29, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
29
2014
eBay Enterprises, Inc. and eBay Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood: Denying Motion to Compel Cross-Examination CBM2014-00025 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc., Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00367 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
Rackspace US, Inc. and Rackspace Hosting, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, Decision on Patent Owner’s Motion to Stay IPR2014-00057 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., Decision on Petitioner’s Request for Declaration IPR2014-00041, 43, 51, 54, 55 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 28, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
25
2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00335 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00401 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
Cyanotech Corporation v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Granting Leave to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2013-00401, 404 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
CAFC Orders District Court to Stay Proceedings Pending CBM Review, Criticizes District Court’s “Review” of PTAB’s Decision to Institute CBM Trial Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
25
2014
Motorola Mobility LLC v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Denying Leave to File Additional Briefing Regarding Updated Mandatory Notice IPR2014-00504 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
The American Invents Act Has Moved the Cheese [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
25
2014
Spectra Logic Corporation v. Overland Storage Inc., Granting Sua Sponte Motion to Exclude Demonstrative Exhibit IPR2013-00357 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 25, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2014
FDA Accepts the First Biosimilar Application under the BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2014
Trending Information: The Connection Between Data Brokers and the Fashion Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
24
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 24, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 5 of a 10-Part Series: Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
23
2014
Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00115 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00180 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
Sequenom, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00337 Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 23, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Emerging Markets: Opportunity, Risk, and What it Means for Brand Protection [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00252 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00353 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
What Trademark Filing Trends Reveal About Expected Brand Growth – and What it Means for Your Global Brand Protection Strategy Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. v. CreateAds LLC, Decision Regarding Standard for Claim Construction IPR2014-00200 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
22
2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, Decision Granting Additional Discovery IPR2014-00097, 98 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Not To Institute IPR2014-00317 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. E-Watch, Inc., Expunging Unauthorized Motion to Exclude and Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2014-00439 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
21
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 21, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
18
2014
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Final Written Decision (FWD) Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Derivation Proceedings: What You Need to Know [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
18
2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Claims 1-26 of the ’672 Patent Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Naughty Dog, Inc. v. McRO, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. v. RPost Communications Ltd. – PTAB Finds Electronic Messaging a “Technological Invention” Outside Ambit of Covered Business Method Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 18, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
18
2014
Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc. — Data Structures Per Se Not Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
VMware, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Order Regarding Non-Compliant Petition Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc., Granting Motion for Additional Briefing on Alice v. CLS Bank Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V., Denying Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision (FWD) Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 17, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
17
2014
Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America v. Optical Devices, LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins