Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jan
31
2020
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Provides Guidance on Timing of Requests for Certificates of Correction During PTAB Proceedings Brinks Gilson & Lione
May
6
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Publishes Trial Transcript from First Covered Business Method Patent Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
9
2017
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Reverses Subject Matter Eligibility Rejections Based on Incomplete Analysis Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
30
2015
Patent Trial and Appeal Board: No Rubber Stamp on Motions to Seal McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
8
2014
Patent Troll Update: Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
20
2014
Patent Troll Update: Japan - Re: Patent Infringement Litigation Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
29
2015
Patent Trolls Are Targeting the Energy Industry Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Feb
17
2014
Patent Trolls: A Global Perspective Re: Patent Infringement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
Patent Trolls: A View from Europe Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
28
2014
Patent Trolls: Can You Sue Them for Suing or Threatening to Sue You? Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Jun
16
2021
Patent Underlying Walker Process Claim is Not Enough to Give Rise to Federal Circuit Jurisdiction Finnegan
May
31
2018
Patent Venue Is Proper Where a Parent Company Defendant “Ratifies” Its Non-Party Subsidiary’s Regular Place of Business in the Forum District Mintz
Mar
31
2016
Patent Venue Legislation Could Have A Dramatic Impact on Popular Patent Venues Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
11
2018
Patent Venue Mandamus Has Its Limits Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
24
2022
Patent Venue Statute Doesn’t Apply to Third-Party Counterclaim Defendant; Acts in Furtherance of Partnership May Be Imputed to Partner for Venue Purposes McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2024
Patent Venue: PREVAIL Act Would Expand Scope of Venue McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
8
2012
Patent War Between St. Jude Medical and Volcano Has Mixed Results Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2012
Patent Wars: EU’s Top Regulator Takes Front Line Position McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2016
Patent-Agent Privilege and USPTO’s Proposed New Rule Mintz
May
15
2015
Patent-Eligibility of Computer Software Inventions in a Post-Alice Era Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Mar
19
2012
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter in Business Method Patents—Fort Properties v. American Master, MySpace v. Graphon Corp. and the Murky, Treacherous Waters of Abstract Ideas Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
16
2013
Patentability Issues for Plants in the European Patent Office (EPO) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2015
Patentability May Be Raised in CBM Patent Review: Covered Business Methods McDermott Will & Emery
May
12
2020
Patentability of COVID-19 Biotech, Pharma & Personal Protective Equipment Inventions Global IP Counselors
May
13
2020
Patentability of COVID-19 Software Inventions: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Data Storage & Blockchain Global IP Counselors
Oct
9
2012
Patentability of Obvious Variants of Derived Knowledge Under the AIA Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
6
2017
Patentability Post-Alice: Cracking The Code IMS Legal Strategies
Nov
27
2014
Patentee May Cancel but May Not Substitute Claims when Proposed Amended Claims Are Not Shown To Be Unobvious McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Patentee Owner Must Show a Nexus Between Alleged Commercial Success and the Claimed Technology McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
23
2014
Patentees Bear Burden of Proving Infringement against Licensees Filing MedImmune Declaratory Judgment Lawsuits Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
19
2013
Patentees Can Continue Patent Infringement Lawsuits in Russia even if a Patent is Found to be Partially Invalid Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
10
2012
Patentees Can File DJ Actions, Too: Complaint in Middle District of GA Provides Example Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
1
2015
Patentee’s Admission that Certain Technology Is Prior Art, Without More, Is Not a Ground of Unpatentability in IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
18
2012
Patentee’s Expert’s Testimony Regarding 40-Year-Old Reference Does Not Overcome the Reference Disclosure McDermott Will & Emery
May
5
2013
Patentee’s Infringement Damages Limited to U.S. Sales and Must Not Be Speculative McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins