Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jun
27
2019
FUCT? You Heard That Right: Refusing to Register “Scandalous” and “Immoral” Trademarks is Unconstitutional Mintz
Dec
19
2023
Year in Review: Laws Impacting Employee Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation, and Non-Disclosure Agreements – What to Know, What to Do and What to Expect in 2024 Mintz
Mar
23
2016
PETA Isn’t Monkeying Around With Copyright Ownership Rights Mintz
Mar
28
2016
Supreme Court Decides to Hear Samsung v. Apple, Appears Ready to Weigh-In on Patent Damage Calculations Mintz
Aug
19
2019
Federal Circuit Cautions Against Rigid Approach to Prosecution History Estoppel in Fourth Appeal from ALIMTA® Litigations Mintz
Oct
10
2019
Collateral Estoppel Does Not Attach To PTAB Invalidity Determination Pending Appeal Mintz
Oct
30
2019
Key Considerations for Global SEP Litigation - Part 1 Mintz
Nov
5
2019
Can Infringement Contentions be Amended to Add New Claims Resulting from an Ex Parte Reexam Filed after IPRs Invalidated Some but Not All Claims? Mintz
Mar
23
2014
USPTO Guidance for Examiners Takes Expansive View of Myriad and Prometheus Decisions - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Mintz
Apr
7
2014
Stay Off My Turf! How to Protect Field of Use in a Biotechnology License Agreement Mintz
Jun
28
2016
California District Court Judge Issues TRO and Preliminary Injunction Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
Mar
25
2020
Second Circuit Affirms 5Pointz Whitewashing Violated Visual Artists Rights Act Mintz
Jun
30
2016
Supreme Court Decides Two Key Aspects of IPR in Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC v. Lee Mintz
Aug
23
2016
Federal Circuit Emphasizes that an Obviousness Analysis Based on Common Sense Must be Supported by Substantial Evidence and Explained with Sufficient Reasoning Mintz
Aug
30
2016
Biosimilar FDA Approvals on Horizon As More States Enact Substitution Laws Mintz
May
12
2020
Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Germany’s Highest Court Tells Sep Implementers That Simply Saying That You Are Willing To License Is Not Enough, And Hold-out Will Not Be Tolerated Mintz
May
18
2020
How the CARES Act Affects Patent Related Deadlines Mintz
Oct
3
2016
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Redskins’ Petition to Join SLANTS Case Mintz
Jun
30
2014
Trademark Rights around the World: It May Be BUDWEISER® in the US, But Not Everywhere Mintz
Jun
25
2020
Shifting “Sands”: New Facts on the Ground Justify Institution of a Previously-Denied IPR Mintz
Jul
6
2020
Judge Albright to Apple: Yes, You Can Be Sued Outside Northern California Mintz
Jul
16
2020
It Takes Two to Tango: The German Federal Supreme Court Acknowledges that Infringer Hold-Out Is a Real Problem Mintz
Nov
15
2016
Failure to Let Patent Owner Address Unpatentability Arguments Relied on by the Board Violates Administrative Procedures Mintz
Dec
15
2016
Supreme Court to Hear Patent Venue Case Mintz
Dec
21
2016
USPTO Proposes Fee Increases for FY 2017 Mintz
Jan
6
2017
ClassCo, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.: A Reminder Of Obviousness Analysis Under KSR Mintz
Feb
1
2017
PTAB Provides A Possible Roadmap For Patent Owners To Successfully Argue Secondary Considerations Of Nonobvious Mintz
Nov
13
2020
No Pleading, No Problem: Court Denies Motion to Dismiss and Bifurcates Willful Infringement Determination, in Absence of Affirmative Willful Infringement Claim Mintz
Mar
30
2017
Why You Should Use USPTO’s Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form Mintz
Feb
2
2021
What's New in 5G - February 2021 Mintz
Apr
25
2017
Federal Circuit to PTAB: No Short Cuts Allowed Mintz
Mar
1
2021
Buyer Beware: Supreme Court Ruling in Hologic May Merit Additional Contractual Protections Mintz
Jun
14
2017
SCOTUS Ruling Gives a Boost to Biosimilars; FDA Continues to Advance Products Through AdComs Mintz
Jun
9
2021
Supreme Court to Consider When Inaccurate Information in a Copyright Registration Affects its Validity in Unicolors v. H&M Mintz
Jun
21
2021
Second Circuit Provides Clarity on “Inherently Suspect” Standard, Overturns FTC’s Ruling on 1-800 Contacts Trademark Agreements Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins