Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Sep
23
2015
Plaintiff Avoids Headache of Having Its Thermometer Patent Invalidated at Summary Judgment Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
24
2022
Plaintiff Can Assert Patent Infringement and Seek Injunctive Relief in Second-Phase BPCIA Litigation Per Illinois District Court Decision Mintz
Aug
1
2014
Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Enforce Patent When Co-Owner Refuses to Participate in Litigation: STC.UNM v. Intel Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
31
2016
Plaintiff Secures Sweeping Jury Verdict in Hotly-Contested Patent Fight Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
18
2018
Plaintiff Torpedoed with Attorneys’ Fees for “Objectively Unreasonable” Copyright Claim Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
16
2017
Plaintiff Unable to Meet Relaxed Standard Under Akamai for Direct Infringement of Method Claims Hunton Andrews Kurth
Dec
2
2015
Plaintiff with Injured Reputation May Have Standing in Inventorship Correction Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
9
2013
Plaintiffs Affiliated with MR CHOW Restaurants Appeal to 11th Circuit in Lanham Act Case Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
7
2021
Plaintiffs Beware – Disclose all Evidence of Lost Profits Damages During Discovery Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
27
2018
Plaintiffs Walk Out in Shame After Attorneys’ Fees Award Affirmed McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2013
Plaintiff’s Foreign Operations Result in “Lessened” Deference to Choice of Home Forum in Trade Secret Misappropriation Case McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
15
2022
Plaintiff’s Third-Party Patent Licensing Information Can Be Sealed from Public View Finnegan
Sep
4
2014
Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS LLC: Bingo Invention Fails Abstract Idea Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
29
2014
Planet Blue v. Namco – Abstract at the “Point of Novelty” re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
5
2021
Planet Plumbing Trade Marks Head Down the Drain K&L Gates
Jun
14
2017
Planned Motion to Dismiss Insufficient to Extend Rule 26(f) Deadlines Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
23
2017
Planning for International Trade Secret Protection Polsinelli PC
Aug
3
2015
Planning for Potential Significant Tax Breaks Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Feb
5
2015
Plant Science, Inc. and Enviro Granulation, Ltd. v. The Andersons, Inc.: Denying Institution IPR2014-00939 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2019
Plant Variety Protection Act Now Covers Asexually Reproduced Plants Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
3
2012
Plants Found in the Wild Are Not Patentable McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
15
2022
Play It Again and Again (Sam): Meanwhile No Injunction, No Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
Play Nice in the Deposition Sandbox McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
8
2020
Playing Fair: Protect Trade Secrets from Business Partners Mintz
Jul
23
2020
Playing Keep-Away: Protecting Your Trade Secrets in a Remote Work Environment Mintz
Dec
19
2014
Playtex Products, LLC, Eveready Battery Company, Inc., and Energizer Holdings, Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., Denying Institution IPR2014-01130 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2024
Plead Your Case, Not Your Secrets: A Discussion of Recent Trade Secret Complaints Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
27
2018
Pleading a Claim for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets in California: A Problem of Particularity Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
25
2011
Pleading Indirect Patent Infringement Post-Twombly Akerman Senterfitt
Oct
12
2016
Pleading Standard Defined– Federal Circuit Holds Joint Infringement Complaint Requires Identification of All Required Claim Steps Mintz
Jan
1
2013
Pleading Unjust Enrichment Does Not Support a Claim for the Underlying Trade Secret Misappropriation McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2015
PNC and SunTrust Bank v. Parus Holdings: Denying Institution Because Patent Ineligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00109; CBM2015-00149 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2015
PNC Bank N.A. v. SECURE AXCESS: Board Uses Discretion to Deny Institution of Petition That is Redundant to Prior Petition CBM2015-00039 Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
PNC Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase & Co: Order Denying Institution of CBM Review Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins