Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Mar
29
2016
PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Commc’n RF, LLC: Presumptions Can Apply in Inter Partes PTAB Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2015
PPS Data Asserts Exclusive Rights To Remote Deposit System For Banks Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
16
2020
Practical Advice for Protecting Trade Secrets K&L Gates
Jul
1
2015
Practical Claim and Specification Drafting, Following Williamson v. Citrix - Patent Litigation Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
14
2017
Practical Guidance on the GDPR – Part 4 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
17
2016
Practical Implications from the Federal Circuit’s Rare en Banc Reversal in Apple v. Samsung K&L Gates
May
23
2017
Practical Issues for the Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Industry in the Wake of TC Heartland Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
1
2019
Practical Takeaways on Design Protection from the Federal Circuit Brinks Gilson & Lione
Jan
30
2015
Practice Considerations Post Teva v. Sandoz Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
2
2015
Practice What You Preach - Yoga Remains Uncopyrightable, for Now Holland & Hart LLP
May
4
2021
Practice What You Preach: Trade Secret Rules (Of Course) Apply to Lawyers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
18
2020
Practicing Product Must Be Essentially Claimed Invention to Link Secondary Considerations to Patent Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
9
2011
Practicing the Prior Art Is Not a Defense McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
8
2015
Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. INO Therapeutics, LLC, Granting Institution Despite Use of References Previously Considered During Prosecution IPR2015-00893 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2020
Prayer for Declaratory Relief Invokes Copyright Act and Available Attorneys’ Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2015
Pre- and Post-Grant Oppositions in India – Part 3 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
30
2014
Pre-AIA (America Invents Act) Statute Did Not Give Patent Owner in an Ex Parte Reexamination the Right to Bring an Action in District Court McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
18
2012
Pre-AIA Patent Infringement Filings Still Subject to Mis-Joinder Rules McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
3
2014
Pre-America Invents Act Litigation Triggers Time Bar for Inter Partes Review: Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Pre-Arbitration Injunction May Only Preserve Status Quo re: Breach of a Trademark License Agreement McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2018
Pre-Enactment Conduct Does Not Bar Relief Under Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act for Continuing Acts of Misappropriation Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
28
2023
Pre-Enforcement Commercialization Isn’t “Impossible” Basis for Personal Jurisdiction of Nonresident Defendant McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
28
2015
Pre-Grant Submissions and Post-Grant Review Proceedings in Brazil – Part 6 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
26
2019
Pre-Institution Merger Creates Time Bar Under § 315(B) McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
11
2015
Pre-Litigation Correspondence Does Not Secure Personal Jurisdiction Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
29
2017
Pre-Merger Intentional Waiver of Privilege Can Extend to Post-Merger Communications: OptumInsight Case McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2014
Pre-Patent Issuance Activities Can Create Justiciable Controversy McDermott Will & Emery
May
11
2017
Pre-Sale Use of Data Storage Trademark Not Enough to Secure Priority Rights Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
31
2014
Pre-suit Claim Construction Analysis Must Satisfy Rule 11 McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
17
2022
Precision Is Paramount: Court Enforces Terms of Email Agreement in Settlement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
16
2013
Predictability Still Needed From Divided Federal Circuit on Software Patents Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Sep
22
2021
Predictably Part 2: Merck Overcomes Obviousness Challenge at the PTAB Finnegan
Sep
21
2021
Predictably, a Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the PTAB FWD - Part 1: Merck Overcomes Inherent Anticipation Challenge at the PTAB Finnegan
Oct
25
2018
Prediction: “Plain and Ordinary Meaning” Is Not Particularly Plain or Ordinary McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2015
Predision Components v. Avx Corp: Petitioner Allowed To Correct Clerical Mistake Of Submitting Unexecuted Declaration IPR2015-01332 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins