Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
16
2021
China Ceases Publishing Patent Application Filings Data Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2021
Bulgari Wins at Beijing’s Intellectual Property Court Invalidating Hijacker’s Serpenti Snake Head Trademark Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
12
2021
Suspended Prison Sentences, Fine and Civil Compensation for Infringement of Chinese Trademark ‘STIHL’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
12
2014
Federal Circuit Finally Meets a Software Patent It Can Love: DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, et al. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2021
Listen to: A Conversation with Janice Mueller, Author of Mueller on Patent Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
30
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Top Ten Cases of Patent Reexamination for 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
29
2014
The Settlement Effect of PTAB Proceedings and Recent Patent Office Trial Statistics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
12
2017
Invalidated patents being burned in protest – a new milestone in recent American history. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
9
2021
China’s Patent Grants Accelerate By Over 50% in First Half of 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
13
2015
Target Wins Rehearing of IPR Joinder Decision with Expanded Panel Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
29
2021
Chinese Patent Office Closure Dates – 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
10
2011
Use Petitions to Reverse Determination of No SNQ (Substantial New Questions of Patentability) in Inter Partes Reexamination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2021
USPTO Sanctions Chinese Trademark Agency by Terminating Over 15,000 U.S. Trademark Applications For Egregious Misconduct in Defrauding the USPTO Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
10
2022
Novartis v. Accord – No Limits on Negative Limitations? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2022
Qualcomm v. Apple – Pyrrhic Victory for Qualcomm? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
1
2011
Report From Bio International Convention in DC– Everyone In the Patent Pool! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2011
Inequitable Conduct in Canada – Disarming the “Atomic Bomb” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2011
Wegner Paper Probes Myriad Decisions Flaws Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
18
2022
European Union Challenges China at the WTO Over Anti-Suit Injunctions Preventing Patent Holders from Asserting Their Rights Outside of China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
5
2017
Should the Australian Patent Office be denying patent eligibility to cDNA inventions? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
31
2011
Obviousness Objections Based On Combinations Of References – Consistent Warnings From The CAFC Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
7
2022
China Releases Summary of Holdings of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court (2021) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
20
2017
So, you are telling me there is a chance? PTAB Finds Anti-Fraud Idea Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
18
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Issues Judicial Interpretation of Anti-Unfair Competition Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2022
China Releases Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Protection by China Customs in 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2022
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Enforcement for 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
29
2015
“If Wishes Were Horses” – Roberts’ Dissent from Myriad Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
8
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate & Ministry of Public Security Jointly Issue Typical Cases Involving Obstructing Epidemic Prevention Including Two Trademark Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
20
2012
Supreme Court Reverses In Prometheus v. Mayo! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
26
2012
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) To Biotech Examiners – We’ll Get Back To You! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2012
Eurand v. Mylan –A “School Of Obviousness" Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
11
2012
USPTO Institutes “QUICK PATH” IDS Pilot Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
26
2022
Vans Wins Triple Punitive Damages in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
31
2022
King Semi Settles Chinese Criminal Trade Secret Case for 60 Million RMB Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2022
Five-Year Prison Sentence for Selling $1.27 Million USD of Counterfeit Armani Watches in Shanghai Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins