Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Feb
8
2014
Bitcoins and Liability in the Wake of Recent Silk Road Arrests Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
7
2020
AIPLA’s Updated Model Patent Jury Instructions Address “Clear and Convincing” Standard of Proof & Streamline Case Citations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
Fortnite Streamer Ewok Pens Sponsorship Deal with HyperX Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
9
2020
The PTAB’s Ground-Breaking Decision in Apple v. Fintiv Promises to Make IPR Institutions More Challenging Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2020
USPTO Announces a New Initiative to Expedite Examination of COVID-19 Related Patent Applications Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2014
USPTO Issues Preliminary Examination Instructions in Light of Alice Corp. - U.S. Patent And Trademark Office Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court and the Lanham Act: Lee v Tam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2020
Supreme Court Deciding Constitutionality of PTAB Judge Appointments Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2017
Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
5
2017
Eleventh Circuit Joins Split Court Decisions on Registration Precondition for Copyright Suits Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2021
Hello Again, Worlds: A Failed Gaming IPR Leads to § 101 Success Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2021
Reminder to Professional Services Firms – Do Not Take Your Trade Secrets for Granted Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2009
Second Circuit Resolves Split Between the Circuits Regarding Sale of Keywords to Trigger Sponsored Links and "Use in Commerce" Under the Lanham Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2010
Mexico Passes New Law on Data Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
2
2011
FDA Announces Its Plan For Changes to the 510(k) "Approval" Pathway Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2022
Federal Circuit Deems Algorithm Potentially Valid Trade Secret Notwithstanding Prior Publication Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2011
Federal Circuit Holds that "Isolated DNA Molecules" Are Patentable Subject Matter and Method Claims Merely "Comparing" or "Analyzing" Are Not Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
4
2022
Dairy, LLC v. Milk Moovement, Inc.: Identifying Software Trade Secrets With Particularity to State a Claim for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2023
SCOTUS: “The More a Party Claims for Itself the More it Must Enable” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
4
2023
Generative AI and Copyright – Some Recent Denials and Unanswered Questions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
3
2019
The U.S. Trademark Office Opens The Door to Registering Certain Cannabis Trademarks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2013
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
4
2023
Computer Love: Beijing Court Finds AI-Generated Image is Copyrightable in Split with United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Will Supreme Court Consider Whether to Allow an Alternative to In-App Purchasing on the App Store? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
14
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates District Court’s Claim Construction of the Term “Pipette Guiding Mechanism” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
23
2019
Don’t Spill Your Trade Secrets: Protecting Your Competitive Advantage in the Food and Beverage Industry (Part 2 of 2) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
Identifying Protocols by Name May Disclose Sufficient Structure for Computer-Implemented Means-Plus-Function Limitations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2019
Italian Film Composer “Scores” for Authors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2013
Kraft v. Cracker Barrel: A Summary of Judge Posner’s Opinion and an Alternative Reverse Confusion Theory of Liability Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2024
Mind Your Audience: Disclosure of Confidential Information to AI Programs Can Give Rise to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
3
2024
FTC’s Campaign Against Improper Orange Book Listings Continues with Amicus Brief in Teva’s Challenge of Amneal Asthma Inhaler ANDA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
5
2020
Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2020 — PART 3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
23
2014
Microsoft-Nokia: China’s MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce) Quietly Slips Into the Debate about Injunctive Relief for FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory)-Encumbered SEPs (Standard Essential Patents) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2020
Breach of FRAND Implications on ITC Exclusion Orders In View of the Public’s Interest Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2016
Compilation of Public Data Can be Trade Secret Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins