Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Apr
25
2018
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et al.: The Magic Happens Around the Word “Franchise” Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
12
2015
OIP Technologies Inc., v. Amazon.com, Inc, (Fed. Cir. 2012-1696) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
30
2015
OIP Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. - Price Optimization in E-Commerce Not Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2013
Okay—Now What? Fractured Federal Circuit Issues Five Opinions in CLS Bank International Case McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
27
2013
Old Claims/New Claims – Need a Psychic to Know What’s Covered and What’s Not McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
30
2013
Old Compound + Known Purpose + Prior Art Concentrations = Obvious Re: IP Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
18
2021
Old Dawg, New Tricks: Bankruptcy Successor Is Also Inter Partes Re-Exam Successor McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2021
Old Dawg, Still the Same Tricks: Bankruptcy Asset Successor is Also Inter Partes Re-Exam Successor McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
7
2022
Old Lady Shows Her Youth with Win in Significant Trade Mark Ruling Concerning NFTS K&L Gates
Feb
15
2023
Old No. 7 Looks to Polish-Off K-9 Toy Maker in Supreme Court Trademark Dispute Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
21
2016
Old Republic General Insurance Group, Inc., et al. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Institution of CBM Review Denied CBM2015-00184 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2014
Old World Christmas Seeks to Protect Alpine Skier Nutcracker Re: Copyright Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
3
2015
Olympus Medical Systems Corp v. Perfect Surgical Tech: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00233 FWD 20150608 Faegre Drinker
Nov
11
2016
Ombudsman in Shining Armor: Spotlight on USPTO Patents Ombudsman Program Mintz
Mar
10
2013
Omega Patents Wraps up One Case and Launches Another Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
1
2014
On a Plain and Ordinary Meaning of “Embedded” Code in a Web Page: Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
17
2016
On Appeal, No Fee Shifting Credit for LevelUp Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
20
2011
On Remand from the Federal Circuit, the District Court in Lucent v. Microsoft Rules Lucent Again Failed to Properly Apply the Entire Market Value Rule Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
2
2014
On Remand, Federal Circuit Comes Around to Supreme Court’s Way of Thinking McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2015
On Remand, Panel Affirms ITC Finding of Section 337 Violation McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2016
On Sale Bar Invalidates Safyral, Beyaz Folate Patent Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
8
2022
On the Border of Art and Trademark: First Amendment Trumps the Lanham Act McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
11
2019
On the Mark: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Latest Decision Regarding the Treatment of Trademark Licenses in Chapter 11 Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
27
2023
On the Road with Generative AI: Key Legal Considerations for the Automotive Industry ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jul
22
2011
On Your .Mark, Get Set, GO! — ICANN Opens the Internet to Unlimited Generic Top-Level Domains Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
8
2017
On Your Mark—"TM" or "®"? Trademark Notice Guidelines Ward and Smith, P.A.
May
30
2017
On-Sale Bar Under the America Invents Act McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
22
2019
On-Sale Bar: Less Clever Way of Saying, Happy Hour? Maybe. Important for Patent Protection? Yes. Ward and Smith, P.A.
May
27
2016
Once Again, Genetic Diagnostic Claims Found Unpatentable Under § 101 McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
10
2022
Once Again, the ITC Finishes the Year with a Flurry of New Complaints Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
3
2013
Once an “Ale House,” Always an “Ale House” - Trademark and Trade Dress Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2013
Once and for All, the Pooh Belongs to Disney - Disney's Trademark Rights McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
15
2015
Once Generic, Always Generic re: Jewelry Trademarks Katten
Mar
27
2015
Once Invalid, Always Invalid: The Federal Circuit Clarifies Application of Issue Preclusion McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
27
2022
One Bad Apple Won’t Spoil the Rest of the Bunch’s Ability to Fairly Compete in Matthews International Corp. v. Lombardi Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins