Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
12
2011
PTO Issues Final Rule to Implement Prioritized Examination Track (Track I) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2022
Qualcomm v. Apple – Pyrrhic Victory for Qualcomm? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
18
2022
European Union Challenges China at the WTO Over Anti-Suit Injunctions Preventing Patent Holders from Asserting Their Rights Outside of China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
5
2017
Should the Australian Patent Office be denying patent eligibility to cDNA inventions? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
7
2022
China Releases Summary of Holdings of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court (2021) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
20
2017
So, you are telling me there is a chance? PTAB Finds Anti-Fraud Idea Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
18
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Issues Judicial Interpretation of Anti-Unfair Competition Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2011
Myriad Petition For Rehearing Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2022
China Releases Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Protection by China Customs in 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2022
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Enforcement for 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2015
OIP Technologies Inc., v. Amazon.com, Inc, (Fed. Cir. 2012-1696) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
8
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate & Ministry of Public Security Jointly Issue Typical Cases Involving Obstructing Epidemic Prevention Including Two Trademark Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
13
2015
In re Cuozzo – Still no changes for the claim interpretation standard during inter partes review proceedings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
21
2015
PTAB Guidance on its View of Petitioner Estoppel: Westlake Services v. Credit Acceptance Corp Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
26
2022
Vans Wins Triple Punitive Damages in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
31
2022
King Semi Settles Chinese Criminal Trade Secret Case for 60 Million RMB Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2022
Five-Year Prison Sentence for Selling $1.27 Million USD of Counterfeit Armani Watches in Shanghai Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
31
2022
China to Remove Infringing Pharmaceuticals from Procurement Platforms Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
5
2023
5-Month Criminal Detention Sentence for Legal Representative of Chinese IP Agency for Forging TM Documents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
7
2018
USPTO Posts slides for new examiner training on Section 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2018
PTO Releases Revised Guidance on Compliance with Mayo/Alice Rule Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
22
2018
Ex Parte Stone: The “Disappearing Doctor” Leaves a Medical Device Behind Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
3
2012
Supreme Court Grants Myriad’s Petition for Cert. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
4
2023
Intellectual Property Tribunal of China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases ‘Typical Cases’ of 2022 List Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
17
2013
PTO Issues Notice on Improvement in Patent Application Quality – A Very Modest Proposal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
22
2013
Brilliant Instruments v. GuideTech – Doctrine of Equivalents on Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
11
2018
Philips Standard of Claim Construction to be Used by PTAB in “AIA Proceedings” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2013
America Invents Act (AIA) Patent Trials Differ from Reexamination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2013
Federal Circuit Patent Litigation Appeal Decision in Versata Software v. SAP Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
5
2019
Hikma and West-Ward v. Vanda – Are Methods of Medical Treatment Patent-Eligible? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
15
2013
Association For Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics – An Isolated Local Difficulty? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
16
2013
Patentability Issues for Plants in the European Patent Office (EPO) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Provides More Guidance on Discovery Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
20
2019
Novartis v. West-Ward – Lead Compound Analysis v. Motivation to Combine Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
6
2019
Senate Subcommittee on IP Feels our PAIN Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins