Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Oct
2
2014
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Endotach LLC: Denying Authorization to File Errata Sheet IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
Apr
25
2015
Medtronic Vascular v. Lifeport Sciences: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00288 Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2015
Medtronic v. Robert Bosch Healthcare: Granting Motions to Seal Tailored to Confidential Information Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
Medtronic v. Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems: Decision Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
Medtronic v. NuVasive: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00073 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
Medtronic v. Marital Deduction Trust and Endotach: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2018
Medical Treatment Patent Claims Held Patentable Subject Matter Under the Alice/Mayo Section 101 Test Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
21
2014
Medical Device Update: FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Releases Final Pre-Submission Guidance Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jul
7
2014
Mediatek Inc. v. Netvinci, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00328 Faegre Drinker
Nov
5
2023
Mediate Early and Sometimes Often Jones Walker LLP
Mar
26
2024
Media & Entertainment: 10 Legal Developments Impacting Business and Legal Decisions ArentFox Schiff LLP
Dec
18
2019
Means-Plus-Function Structure – Can be it Incorporated by Reference? Mintz
Oct
21
2021
Means-Plus-Function Claims: Don’t Forget the “Way” McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
16
2016
McRO v. Namco – Fed. Cir. Reverses s. 101 Invalidation of Animation Method Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
29
2018
McDermott's Reverse Engineered Podcast | IP Headlines for March 2018 McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
10
2014
McClinton Energy Group v. Magnum Oil Tools International: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00231 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2016
McAFEE v. CAP CO.: No Patentable Weight To Preamble Amendments In This Patent IPR2015-01855, 1877 Faegre Drinker
Feb
7
2019
Mayo Wins in Another s. 101 Appeal – Discovery of a Useful Natural Correlation is not Patent Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
18
2014
Mayo Meet Alice Meet Myriad – Fed. Cir. Appreciates “Abstract Art” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
31
2016
May 2016 Update - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
12
2015
Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation: Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Submit New Testimonial Evidence IPR2015-00594 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
MaxLinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation: Denying Institution Where the Petition is Substantially the Same as a Previous Petition IPR2015-00591 Faegre Drinker
Feb
12
2016
Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation - Granting Motion to Compel Routine Discovery Cited in Patent Owner Response IPR2015-00592; IPR2015-00594 Faegre Drinker
Feb
27
2020
Maximizing Your IP Protections in Digital Health McDermott Will & Emery
May
7
2015
Maximizing Use of the USPTO’s Patent Application Alert Service Mintz
May
10
2024
Matters of Time - SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
7
2013
Mattel v. MGA Entertainment—The BRATZ Saga Continues McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
17
2023
Mattel Defeats Chinese Trademark Applicant Attempting to Register “Barbie” for Services Including Artificial Insemination (For Animals) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
16
2021
Material Information Submitted to FDA but Withheld from PTO Gives Rise to Inequitable Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
20
2017
Matal v. Tam: U.S. Supreme Court Holds Prohibition on Disparaging Trademarks Unconstitutional under First Amendment Mintz
Sep
26
2018
Matal and Brunetti: When Derogatory isn’t Derogatory Stark & Stark
May
10
2024
Mastering Personal Branding: Essential Strategies for Lawyers Stefanie Marrone Consulting
Jul
1
2015
Masterimage 3D, Inc. v. Reald Inc.: Denying Authorization to Terminate Proceeding in Petitioner’s Effort to Avoid Estoppel IPR2015-00035 Faegre Drinker
Jan
23
2016
MasterImage 3d, Inc. et al. v. Reald Inc., Parties’ Unauthorized Mandatory Notices Submissions Expunged Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
Masterimage 3d et al. v. Reald: Denying Request to File Motion to Expunge Where Issue Could be Addressed in Sur-Reply IPR2015-00035 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins