Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
6
2014
Patent Term Adjustment: Not available solely in the U.S. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
6
2014
Expungement of Unauthorized Filings Under 37 CFR § 42.7(a), MotivePower, Inc. v. Cutsforth, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
6
2014
Unincorporated Associations Can Own and Enforce Trademark Rights, Southern California Darts Association v. Zaffina McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2014
A Warehouse Full of Unapproved Genetically-Modified Seeds; Now What?, Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. Bunge North America, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2014
Delays with Start-Up Visa In Israel Hurt High Tech Firms Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
5
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review CBM2014-00104 Faegre Drinker
Oct
5
2014
Top 5 Responsive Web Design Myths Put To Rest Consultwebs.com, Inc.
Oct
5
2014
False Origin Claims Applicable to Services as Well as Goods Regarding Trademarks, M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. & Assoc. v. Strabala McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2014
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Depomed, Inc., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00651 Faegre Drinker
Oct
5
2014
PTAB on Analogous Art, Schott Gemtron Corp. v. SSW Holding Co., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2014
No Motivation to Combine Where Combination Requires Complete Redesign, Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
Holy Non-Infringement, Batman!, Fortres Grand Corporation v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
Judge Posner Orders Sherlock Holmes Estate to Pay Attorneys’ Fees for “Form of Extortion”, Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
Ninth Circuit Finds Permanent Injunction Questionable Despite Trademark Infringement, La Quinta Worldwide LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. De C.V., dba Quinta Real McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
PTAB Denies Motion to Amend a Motion to Amend; Reason: Delay Tandus Flooring, Inc. v. Interface, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
Emerging Technology and Existing Law: Can Geofencing Provide Radio Webcasters a Workaround of Digital Performance Royalties? Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
4
2014
Movants Face a High Bar to Succeed on Motions to Amend: Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
Patent Owners: Better Address All Obviousness Arguments Raised by Petitioner, Pharmatech Solutions, Inc. v. LifeScan Scotland Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
PTAB Grants Request for Rehearing Relating to Procedure for Serving Petitions, Facebook, Inc. v. Rembrandt Social Media, L.P. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Inter Partes Review Not Stayed, Despite Looming Patent Ownership Trial, Symantec Corp. v. RPost Commc’ns Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Don’t Throw It Away: A Company May Not Have Rights to Confidential Information It Puts in the Garbage, Greenpeace, Inc. v. The Dow Chemical Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Neste Oil OYJ v. REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Strike Reply Evidence IPR2013-00578 Faegre Drinker
Oct
3
2014
Petitioner Barred from Raising Arguments Not in Petition, TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Elecs., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Counsel May Confer with a Witness between Cross-Examination and Re-Cross, but the Witness Might Be Re-Crossed on the Substance of Such a Discussion, Organik Kimya AS v. Rohm and Haas Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Know the Patent Specification Before Filing a Motion to Amend: Veeam Software Corp. v. Symantec Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
The Narrow Scope of Supplemental Discovery in an Inter Partes Review: Square, Inc., v. REM Holdings 3, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Did the USPTO Really Improve the ‘After Final Consideration Pilot’? Mintz
Oct
3
2014
Supplemental Information Authorization Hard to Come By: International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Motions to Amend Hard to Come By: Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. v. Aqua Products, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Decision on Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
Oct
3
2014
Norman International, Inc. v. Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust, Russell L. Hinckley, Sr. (Co-Trustee) and Robert F. Miller (Co-Trustee) Granting and Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
K-40 Electronics, LLC v. Escort, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00240 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Microsoft Corporation v. Enfish: Denying Motion for Joinder and Institution IPR2014-00574 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
First Final CBM Decision Invalidates Patent Under § 101: U.S. Bancorp v. Retirement Capital Access Management Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Endotach LLC: Denying Authorization to File Errata Sheet IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Becton, Dickinson and Company v. One StockDuq Holdings, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00235 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal Where Co-Owner of Patent Refuses to Join Suit Mintz
Oct
2
2014
PTAB Applies “Issue Joinder” Analysis to Deny Microsoft’s IPR Joinder Requests Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
2
2014
IGB Automotive and I.G. Bauerhin v. Gentherm: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00663 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Designates Two Recent Decisions as Informative, Garmin v. Cuozzo; Idle Free Systems v. Bergstrom McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Target Corporation v. Destination Maternity Corporation: Denying Motion for Joinder and Denying Institution IPR2014-00508 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
CBM Review Cannot Proceed if Petitioner Filed Civil Suit Challenging Patent’s Validity Prior to Filing Review Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Federal Circuit Remands Trio of Attorneys’ Fee Award Cases Back to District Courts in the Octane Fitness and Highmark Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 2, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
2
2014
Handi Quilter, Inc. and Tacony Corporation v. Bernina International AG: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00364 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Claim Construction Clarified, Not Changed, Post-Verdict: Mformation Technologies v. Research In Motion McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Decision Not to Institute IPR Is Final and Not Appealable McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
License Definition Trumps Need for Actual Infringement Finding: Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Foreign Marketing Materials Relevant to Domestic Infringement Amdocs (Israel): Ltd. v. Openet Telecom, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2014
Sham-Wow! Antitrust Liability May Attach to Sham Administrative Petitions: Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharm. Co., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins