Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
24
2014
Section 101 at AIPLA - American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2021
Legal Digital Transformation – Lesson #2: Externalizing Manual Work is Not Digital Transformation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2021
China’s Ministry of Public Security Releases Discusses Status of Intellectual Property Criminal Investigations and Lists Typical Cases of Public Security Agencies Cracking Down on Crimes of Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
25
2021
China Releases Transition Measures for Amended Patent Law Going Into Effect June 1, 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2017
Just When You Thought Things Couldn’t Get Worse Via Application Of 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2021
USPTO Publishes Interim Process for Director’s Review of PTAB Decisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
28
2021
Chemours Co. v. Daikin Industries – Back to Some IP Basics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
24
2017
PTAB on the Right Track in Ex parte MARK L. MORSCH, et. al. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
7
2021
Xiaoi Robot Seeks Preliminary Injunction Against Apple in Shanghai Patent Infringement Suit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2021
China’s Hainan Province Proposes 1 Million RMB Rewards for Reporting Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
20
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Issues Interpretation of Administrative Adjudication of Patent Linkage Measures Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
12
2015
Financial Product Search System Found Patent Ineligible Under Section 101 by Delaware Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
14
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Cease Issuing Paper Trademark Certificates Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
11
2021
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Accepts China’s First Drug Patent Linkage Litigation Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
26
2021
China’s New Guidelines for Trademark Examination and Trial Elaborate on Malicious Trademark Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
25
2022
Shanghai No. 3 Intermediate People’s Court Affirms Prison Sentence in 61 Million RMB Cartier Counterfeit Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2015
Genetic Engineering Makes the Blacklist Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
7
2017
Mallinckrodt v. Praxair – Innomax Method Patent Fails Alice/Mayo Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
4
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate Released 4 Typical Cases of Enforcement of Criminal Intellectual Property Laws Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
13
2022
Europol: More Than Half of Counterfeits Originate in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court decides Stanford v. Roche – Clarifies Scope of Bayh-Dole Act Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Second Batch of Guiding Cases of Administrative Enforcement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration: Crackdown on 482,000 malicious registered trademarks in 2021, Rejection of 12,200 Trademark for Malicious Hoarding Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
30
2011
Divided Panel Finds DNA Molecules Patentable – Cancer Screening Claims Too Abstract Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
23
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Approves Establishment of First 3 Foreign Patent Agencies in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
23
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Sanctions 3 Trademark Firms for Forging Evidence Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2015
Ariosa v. Sequenom – Novel Genetic Analysis Fails The Mayo Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2022
NY Attorney Suspended for Filing Over 18,000 U.S. Trademark Applications for Chinese Agents Without Proper Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
19
2012
AMP Petitions for Cert. and A Look Back Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
30
2022
China to Add Statement of Use Requirement for Trademarks? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
21
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Draft Judicial Interpretation of Anti-Monopoly Civil Procedures for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
1
2022
NetEase Wins 50 Million RMB & Injunction on Appeal in Minecraft Infringement Litigation at the Guangdong Higher People’s Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
19
2015
Takeaways from Seattle Chisum Patent Academy 2015 Seminars Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
16
2023
Chinese Invention Patent Grants Up 14.7% in 2022 YoY; Utility Model Grants Down 10.1% Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
17
2023
Mattel Defeats Chinese Trademark Applicant Attempting to Register “Barbie” for Services Including Artificial Insemination (For Animals) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins