June 28, 2022

Volume XII, Number 179

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Sanctions 3 Trademark Firms for Forging Evidence

Per a Notice (“蓝天行动”:严厉打击商标代理伪造证据行为) released June 21, 2022, China’s National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has sanctioned three Chinese trademark firms for forging evidence in applications for geographical indications (GI). A GI is a distinctive sign used on products that have a specific geographic origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin. Two agencies were fined 40,000 RMB each and a third was fined 20,000 RMB as well as issued warnings. In addition, the responsible individuals also issued warnings and fined.

 

 

In the process of applying for the trademark for the geographic indication “Guanmen Hongmei”, a Sichuan trademark agency tampered with the Annals of Nanjiang County; a Hebei Intellectual Property Agency tampered with the Notice of Qiu County during the course of applying for the trademark for the geographic indication “Qiu County Abalone Mushrooms.” In the process of applying for trademark with geographic indication on “Shaoguan Triangle” and “Shaoguan Bighead Bream” on behalf of a company in Shaoguan, a Shaoguan firm  tampered with the Shaoguan Yearbook (1996—2000), Shaoguan Yearbook (2009) and Shaoguan Municipal Records (1988—2000). The above-mentioned three trademark agencies submitted the altered materials as evidence to the CNIPA, which violated the relevant provisions of the Trademark Law, and, after the trademark law enforcement department where they were located investigated and obtained evidence, imposed a warning and a fine of 40,000 RMB upon the Sichuan agency according to law; a warning and a fine of 40,000 RMB imposed upon the Hebei agency; and a warning and a fine of 20,000 RMB against the Shaoguan firm. Further, the administrative penalties of warning and fine of undisclosed amount were imposed on the relevant liable persons.

CNIPA stated that it

will continue to crack down on trademark agency violations of laws and regulations in accordance with the highest standards, strongest measures, and strictest requirements, increase public exposure, further purify the trademark agency market, and promote the standardized development of the trademark agency industry.

The Notice can be found here (Chinese only).

© 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 174
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Aaron Wininger IP Attorney China Portfolio Development
Director of China Intellectual Property Law Practice Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner

Aaron Wininger is a Senior Attorney and Schwegman’s Director of China Intellectual Property. Aaron counsels both U.S. and Chinese companies on portfolio development and preparation of their patent applications and office action responses. He has worked with clients in the areas of software, networks (wired and wireless), lasers, medical devices, semiconductors and physics.

Aaron prosecutes both Chinese and U.S. trademarks. He has also drafted and prosecuted hundreds of U.S. and international patent applications in a broad spectrum of areas, including computer hardware and software,...

408-278-4059
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement