Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
May
17
2021
License Agreement Not Enough for Standing on Appeal of an IPR Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc. Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
20
2012
Libya Loses Court Battle Over Its Own ‘Libyan Embassy’ Trademark Ifrah Law
Oct
20
2014
Librestream Technoloiges, Inc. v. Wireless Remote System LLC.: Order Vacating Due Dates IPR2014-00369 Faegre Drinker
Feb
27
2015
Librestream Technologies, Inc. v. Thomason: You Can’t Win if You Don’t Play McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
7
2012
Liability for Inducing Infringement Does Not Require a Single Entity Direct Infringer Mintz
Sep
2
2020
Liability for Copyright Infringement Attaches if Conduct Exceeds Scope of License McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
13
2016
LG Electronics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies ULC, Granting Request to Expunge Motion for Observation IPR2015-00325 Faegre Drinker
Sep
11
2015
LG Electronics v. Advanced Micro Devices: Must Request Authorization to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Within One Month of Institution IPR2015-00324 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2015
LG ELECTRONICS v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Institution Denied With Insufficient Evidence of Public Accessibility of Printed Publications IPR2015-00329 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2015
LG Electronics v. Advanced Micro Devices: Denying Institution of Challenged Claims IPR2015-00323 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
LG Electronics Toshiba VIZIO and Hulu v. Straight Path IP Group: Decision on Institution IPR2015-00196 Faegre Drinker
Jan
26
2015
LG Display, Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01095 Faegre Drinker
Dec
17
2014
LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Denying Leave to File a Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-01357, 1362 Faegre Drinker
Jan
27
2015
LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Denying Institution IPR2014-01092 Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLC: Granting Institution of One Asserted Ground of Unpatentability IPR2015-00506 Faegre Drinker
Feb
23
2021
LG Chem’s Win In $1 Billion Electric Vehicle Trade Secret Dispute Upheld by International Trade Commission Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
14
2014
Lex Machina’s 2013 Patent Litigation Report Shows Disparity Between Litigated Patents and those under PTAB Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
13
2024
Levi Strauss Settles Trademark Dispute Over Pocket Tab on Jeans K&L Gates
May
8
2015
LevelUp’s Pursuit of Attorney’s Fees Goes Up to the Federal Circuit Level Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
4
2014
Leveling the Culinary Field: Typographical Corrections in Markman Ruling Allow Food Service Equipment Leveling Device Patent to be Construed Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
14
2014
Level 3 Communications, LLC v. AIP Acquisition LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00296 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2014
Let’s Set the Record Straight....the Redskins Still Own the REDSKINS Trademarks Mintz
Mar
28
2017
Let’s Go, Big ©! Let’s Go! U.S. Supreme Court Backs Copyright Protection for Cheerleading Uniforms Mintz
Mar
18
2015
Let’s Get Personal – Trademark Protection for Personal Names Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Mar
5
2013
Let’s Continue with Insights about Software Patenting Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
12
2011
Let The Reformation Begin! Patent Reform Act Passes Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
14
2012
Let the Jury Decide Trade Secret Misappropriation Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
19
2015
Lessons Learned From The 1st Successful Pharmaceutical IPR Defense of Orange Book Listed Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
19
2014
Lessons Learned from IPR Live Testimony: An Eye-Witness Account of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) Recent Witness Questioning Armstrong Teasdale
Mar
2
2023
Lessons Learned From 2022’s Trade Secret Verdicts Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
7
2014
Lessons from Nautilus v. Biosig at the Supreme Court [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
21
2016
Lessons For Persuading the Patent Board: Straight From Judges’ Mouths Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
3
2018
Lessons about Prosecution History Estoppel and Design Patents from Advantek Marketing, Inc. v. Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co. Mintz
Mar
2
2017
Less Utility Than Alternatives Does Not Make Product’s Trade Dress Protectable McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
29
2019
Less or More? Asserting Infringement Under Doctrine of Equivalents can be Sticky McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins