Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jun
12
2011
Patent Holder Takes a Shot at Nintendo over DSi Cameras Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2016
Patent Infringement Claim Exempts Related Counterclaims from Mandatory Arbitration McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
18
2018
Patent Infringement Claim Involving Complicated Technology May Require Additional Detail in Complaint Mintz
Dec
30
2012
Patent Infringement Claims Not Precluded by Related Trademark Infringement Claims in Prior Suit McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
18
2014
Patent Infringement Complaint Seeks To Fence Competitor Out Of Field Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
31
2014
Patent Infringement Defense Leveraging Contested Proceedings [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
29
2014
Patent Infringement Litigation: No Appellate Jurisdiction Over an Interlocutory Contempt Order McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
27
2020
Patent Infringement Pleading Standards Remain Unsettled Five Years After the Abrogation of Form 18 – Part 1: Inconsistent Federal Circuit Guidance Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2021
Patent Infringement Pleading Standards Remain Unsettled Five Years After the Abrogation of Form 18 – Part 2: Pleading Standards in Delaware Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2022
Patent Infringement Verdict Nixed over Judge’s Stock Ownership McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
20
2016
Patent Infringement: 'Trump Win' Theory Comes in Says the Playtex Playbook IMS Legal Strategies
Jun
15
2016
Patent Infringement: Amendment Moots Motions for Both Parties without Specific Adoption of Prior Filings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
2
2017
Patent Infringement: Injunction Against Third Party Maintained Pending Remand McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
27
2016
Patent Infringement: Method Requiring Physical Action Not Claiming Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
28
2016
Patent Infringement: Once Again, Written Description Does Not Limit Claim Scope McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2016
Patent Infringement: Pennsylvania Court Invalidates Improper Multiple Dependent Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
27
2016
Patent Infringement: Promises And Pitfalls Of 3D Printing Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
14
2016
Patent Infringement: Rising Tide of State-Enacted Reform Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
30
2014
Patent Infringement: “Soda-Pop” Bottle Caps Can Be Analogous Art for Flash Chromatography Cartridges McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
10
2022
Patent Invalidity Doesn’t Demonstrate Good Faith for Consent Order Violation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
9
2023
Patent Law Principles Apply to Claim Scope: Orange Book Delisting and Listing and Regulations McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
15
2011
Patent Law Unchanged by Microsoft Supreme Court Decision Vedder Price
Apr
21
2015
Patent Legislation Goes Mainstream Covington & Burling LLP
Sep
12
2011
Patent License Is Presumed to Cover Continuation Applications McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
7
2013
Patent Licenses Extend to Reissue Patents Unless Specifically Limited McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
20
2023
Patent Linkage Litigation in China: A Two-Year Review Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
11
2011
Patent Litigants -- the 25% Rule is Dead! Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Nov
13
2014
Patent Litigation and the Innovation Economy Analysis Group, Inc.
Mar
11
2014
Patent Litigation and the Proposed Innovation Act of 2013 [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
4
2020
Patent Litigation Filings on the Increase with the COVID-19 Pandemic Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
24
2017
Patent Litigation Venue: Supreme Court Clarifies Venue Statutes in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods. Mintz
Mar
17
2016
Patent Litigation: Could Eastern District of Texas’s Reign Come to End? Mintz
May
3
2016
Patent Litigation: Not Obvious to Combine References for Person of Ordinary Skill in Art (POSITA) Mintz
Feb
12
2018
Patent Marking Basics Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
4
2013
Patent Marking: An Extrajudicial Admission that the Product Is Covered by the Patent but Not an Estoppel McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins