Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Sep
30
2016
Patent Rights in the U.S.: Is the Pendulum Finally Swinging Back to Center? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
21
2015
Patent Safe Harbor Applies To Supplemental New Drug Applications Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
2
2018
Patent Specification Drafting Considerations Highlighted by TF3 Limited v. TRE Milano, LLC Mintz
May
27
2016
Patent Specification Trumps Claim Construction Canon in High-Stakes Reversal McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
17
2018
Patent Strategies for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2020
Patent Strategies For Expedited Chinese Approval Of Medical Devices Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
21
2015
Patent Subject Matter Eligibility – Impact on Litigation and Prosecution Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
1
2019
Patent Sublicense Does Not Automatically Survive Termination of Principal License McDermott Will & Emery
May
3
2018
Patent System after Oil States and SAS – What’s the future? Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
27
2011
Patent System Fosters Eugenics – What Next? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
5
2019
Patent Term Adjustment Denied For Interference-Related Delays McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
17
2016
Patent Term Adjustment In South Korea Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
26
2015
Patent Term Adjustment In The Post-RCE Period -- Request for Continued Examination Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
31
2015
Patent Term Adjustment of Parent Application Does Not Extend to Continuation Applications McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
6
2019
Patent Term Adjustment The Real Meaning Applicant Delay Mintz
Nov
19
2012
Patent Term Adjustment Update - Exelixis v. Kappos Armstrong Teasdale
Jan
24
2014
Patent Term Adjustment Update - Novartis v. Lee Armstrong Teasdale
Feb
25
2016
Patent Term Adjustment Versus Double Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
14
2018
Patent Term Adjustment: Lessons Learned from the Federal Circuit Decision in Actelion v. Matal Mintz
Oct
6
2014
Patent Term Adjustment: Not available solely in the U.S. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
22
2023
Patent Term Compensation in México OLIVARES
Aug
15
2017
Patent Term Extension Considerations for BioPharma Patents Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
25
2013
Patent Term Extension in Russia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
7
2020
Patent Term Extension Only Applies to Approved Product McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
11
2012
Patent Trends (or Lack thereof) in Green Energy Technology Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
30
2016
Patent Trends to Watch in 2016 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
29
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Addresses Concurrent Prosecution of Patentably Indistinct Claims Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Authorizes SAP to file Opposition to Versata’s Rehearing Request Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
13
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Covered Business Method: Versata Patent Claims Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
2
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Designates Two Recent Decisions as Informative, Garmin v. Cuozzo; Idle Free Systems v. Bergstrom McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
9
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants in Part Request for Rehearing of its Decision on Live Testimony from Inventor Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
31
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants Motion for Early Termination of Proceeding Before Covered Business Method Trial Institution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
24
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Invalidates Patent in First Inter Partes Review (IPR) Trial of a Design Patent Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
4
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Issues First Precedential Opinion Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
2
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Permits Substitution of New Claims in Challenged Patent McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins