May 8, 2021

Volume XI, Number 128

Advertisement

May 07, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 06, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 05, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

ABA Resists Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Nursing Home Admissions Contracts

Mandatory Arbitration in Nursing Home Admission Contracts

A proposed rule change introduced by the Trump administration would authorize mandatory, pre-dispute arbitration in long-term care admissions contracts. The proposed rule is in response to an Obama administration rule that prohibited federal funding for long-term care facilities that required residents to resolve disputes through arbitration.

ABA Writes Letter Opposing Rule Change

In a recent letter, the American Bar Association (ABA) advocates for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to retain its current rule prohibiting long-term care facilities from entering into binding arbitration agreements with residents until after a dispute arises. In the letter sent to CMS administrator Seema Verma, the ABA writes that implementing the proposed rule would harm residents’ rights and interests.

Current Rule Follows Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark Precedent

The ABA takes the position that the current rule follows the recent United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act in Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark. Contrasting the view that Kindred Nursing banned pre-dispute binding arbitration in long-term care admissions contracts, the ABA letter states that Kindred held that under the FAA, arbitration agreements may only be found invalid based on legal rules that would apply to any contract. The ABA states that while Kindred prohibits singling out arbitration agreements for disfavored treatment, the Supreme Court did not single out arbitration agreements for favored treatment. CMS is proposing to do exactly that – to implement a “total embrace of mandatory pre-dispute arbitration provisions” in nursing home admissions contracts, wrote Thomas M. Susman, director of the ABA’s Governmental Affairs Office.

Senators Against Forced Arbitration Clauses

In another letter to Verma, 31 U.S. senators ask that the CMS rethink the proposed rule. Their letter states that forced arbitration clauses in nursing home agreements “stack the deck against residents and their families.” The senators maintain that residents face a wide range of potential harms, including physical abuse and neglect, sexual assault, and wrongful death in long-term care facilities. Forced arbitration clauses would prevent the most vulnerable individuals from seeking justice in a court of law. All types of legal claims, no matter how egregious, would be funneled into a “privatized dispute resolution system that is often biased toward the nursing home.” Accountability would be denied to residents and their families.

Advertisement
COPYRIGHT © 2021, STARK & STARKNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 227
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

The Stark & Stark nursing home negligence attorneys will fight to recover all the benefits you deserve. As a result of our experience in representing clients in nursing home negligence matters and through careful assessment and preparation, our nursing home negligence lawyers help victims and their families obtain cash settlements for injury, medical expenses, and pain and suffering. Sometimes these positive outcomes are achieved only by going to trial. However, in many cases our lawyers are able to obtain favorable settlements outside of the courtroom, making the experience less...

609.895.7345
Advertisement
Advertisement