April 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 107

Advertisement

April 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Alleged Price Gouging in the District of Columbia? Attorney General Racine Sets Sights on Local Business

On November 12, 2020, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine filed a lawsuit against Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC (“CPG”), a retailer and distributor of gasoline in the District. According to Attorney General Racine, CPG overcharged its customers for gasoline in violation of the Natural Disaster Consumer Protection Act (“NDCPA”). This is the latest example of aggressive attorneys general investigating price gouging allegations that go well beyond personal protective equipment and other staples.

The complaint alleges that CPG violated the law by engaging in price gouging during an emergency, as well as unfairly increasing profits on gas distribution. In its investigation, the OAG obtained data that during the three months preceding the March 11, 2020, declaration of emergency, CPG’s average profits per gallon on regular gasoline and premium gas were $0.44 and $0.88, respectively. In the complaint, the Attorney General alleges that CPG’s average profit per gallon in the weeks following the pandemic increased to $0.88 per gallon of regular gas, and $1.23 per gallon of premium gas that it sold. Attorney General Racine is seeking injunctive relief, restitution, civil penalties, and attorney’s fees.

D.C.’s price gouging law prohibits sellers from charging “more than the normal average retail price for any merchandise or service sold during a public health emergency.” D.C. Code § 28-4102(a). The “normal average retail price” under the NDCPA is “the price equal to the wholesale cost plus a retail mark-up that is the same percentage over wholesale cost as the retail mark-up for similar merchandise sold in the Washington Metropolitan Area during the 90-day period that immediately preceded an emergency.” Id. at § 28-4101(2)(B). A violation of the law can result in penalties of up to $5,000 per violation. A key issue in the case is likely to be whether the defendant’s prices or mark-up exceeded the “normal average retail price”, as there are numerous questions of fact that must be determined, and defenses may be available.

Attorney General Racine’s lawsuit is not the first of its kind. In the early months of the pandemic, Attorney General Racine brought a lawsuit against a D.C. convenience store for allegedly charging $12.99 for 121-oz. bottles of bleach. This, Attorney General Racine said, was 200 percent higher than the price offered by other retailers in the District. The lawsuit followed a cease and desist letter ordering the store to reduce its price. Attorney General Racine stated that the “Office of the Attorney General will enforce the law against stores like [this] that flatly refuse to adhere to a cease and desist letter that it received from my office.”

This lawsuit reflects a further reach by attorneys general against a broad range companies, accusing them of price gouging goods and services beyond personal protective equipment. Like the District’s price gouging law, many state laws are broad in scope, and potentially may be applied to a variety of goods and services that arguably should be outside the scope of price gouging laws. To mitigate this risk, businesses should be familiar with the variety of goods and services that state laws may cover and implement compliance practices as necessary. For more compliance practice tips, read our previous blog post.

Advertisement
© 2021 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume X, Number 329
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Christopher Ondeck Antitrust Litigator chair of  Proskauer Rose nationwide Antitrust Group
Partner

Chris Ondeck is a partner in the Litigation Department and vice-chair of the Antitrust Group. He focuses his practice on representing clients in civil and criminal antitrust litigation, defending mergers and acquisitions before the U.S. antitrust agencies, defending companies involved in government investigations, and providing antitrust counseling.

Chris has handled antitrust matters for clients in a number of industries, including advertising, aerospace, alcoholic beverages, appliances, building materials, defense, medical devices, metals,...

202-416-5865
John Ingrassia, Antitrust Attorney, Telecommunications, Proskauer Law firm
Special Counsel

John Ingrassia is a special counsel and advises clients on a wide range of antitrust matters in various industries, including chemicals, pharmaceutical, medical devices, telecommunications, financial services, health care, and others. His practice includes a significant focus on the analysis of Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notification requirements, the coordination and submission of Hart-Scott-Rodino filings, and the analysis and resolution of antitrust issues related to mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. John has extensive experience with the legal, practical,...

202.416.6869
Kelly Landers Hawthorne, Proskauer Law Firm, New York, Litigation Attorney
Associate

Kelly Landers Hawthorne is an attorney in the Litigation Department.

Education

  • Columbia Law School, J.D., 2017

  • George Mason University, M.Ed., 2013

  • University of Richmond, B.A., 2011

212-969-3537
Law Clerk

Nathaniel Miller is a Law Clerk in the litigation department. He works for the firm's New York offices. 

Education

  • New York University School of Law, J.D., 2017
  • Harvard University, B.A., 2014
212-969-354
Nicollette R. Moser Litigation & Antitrust Proskauer Rose Washington, DC
Associate

Nicollette Moser is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Antitrust Group.

Related Practices

  • Litigation
  • Antitrust

Admissions & Qualifications

  • District of Columbia
202.416.5862
Advertisement
Advertisement