May 29, 2020

May 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Are Fracking Fluid Recipes Trade Secrets? Wyoming Supreme Court Sends Issue Back to District Court

In a unanimous opinion issued March 12, 2014, the Wyoming Supreme Court reversed and remanded a case concerning the confidentiality of the ingredients in fracking fluids. The decision keeps alive a challenge to the confidentiality of fracking fluid recipes in Wyoming.

Four environmental organizations brought the suit in a Casper, Wyoming, district court to challenge the decision of the Supervisor of the Wyoming Oil & Gas Commission that granted trade secret status to fracking fluid ingredients. In 2010, the Commission required companies to submit a complete list of the chemicals used in fracking fluid, but the companies may ask for and receive trade secret protection for the chemicals upon a sufficient showing to the Supervisor.

The Court ruled that the environmental organizations used the incorrect procedure to attack the Supervisor’s decision, thereby precluding the Court’s ability to review the trade secret determination. Rather than challenging the determination under the Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act, the environmental organizations should have used the specific procedure set forth under the Wyoming Public Records Act. The Court returned the case to the Casper district court for an evidentiary hearing on each individual trade secret claim being challenged.

Despite its decision on the procedural issue, the Court specifically adopted the definition of “trade secret” found in the federal Freedom of Information Act, a ruling that will aid the district court in this and other such challenges.

Of note, the Court made no rulings on whether fracking ingredients can be “trade secrets” and did not find Wyoming’s rules for protecting trade secrets to be inappropriate or improper.  Further, the Court did not order that any chemical lists be made public – leaving that decision to the district court.

©2020 All Rights Reserved. Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP


About this Author

John A. Masterson, Oil and Gas Attorney, Lewis Roca Rothgerber, law firm

Mr. Masterson's practice focuses on the areas of Oil and Gas Law, Estate Planning and Administration, Arbitration and ‎Mediation and Litigation.‎

Beginning with a return to his hometown of Casper after graduation from the University of Wyoming's College of ‎Law, Mr. Masterson worked for County and District Courts in Natrona County, performing legal research for ‎judges, drafting opinions and decision letters and assisting the court in hearings and jury trials. Following this ‎one-year term, Mr. Masterson began three years of private practice focusing on oil and gas law, criminal ‎...