February 21, 2020

February 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 20, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 19, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

BIS Amends Regulations Governing Export and Reexport of Geospatial Imaging Software

On January 6, 2020, the US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published an interim final rule amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to make software specially designed to automate the analysis of geospatial imagery subject to the EAR and to impose a requirement of a license for the export and reexport of such software. The license requirement applies to export and reexport to all countries, except Canada. The software is, as of the notice on January 6, 2020, classified under the Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 0D521.

Background

BIS established the 0Y521 series of ECCNs in 2012 to identify items, such as software, that warrant control through the Commerce Control List (CCL) but have yet to be classified under an existing ECCN. The 0Y521 series is a temporary holding classification that remains in place for one year from the date a final rule identifying the item is published in the Federal Register, unless the item is re-classified under a different ECCN, is designated EAR99 or the 0Y521 classification is extended. During this 12-month period, the US government can determine an appropriate longer-term export control for the item or that the item does not warrant control through the CCL. BIS made the addition of the software to the 0Y521 series of ECCNs based on the determination by the US Departments of Commerce, Defense, and State and other agencies that the software warrants export control because it could provide a significant military or intelligence advantage to the US or due to other foreign policy justifications. It appears the geospatial imaging software described by the control parameters was previously classified as EAR99, but upon review through a commodity jurisdiction or classification request, the US government determined the software should be subject to export control. It was, accordingly, classified under ECCN 0D521.

The Department of Commerce’s decision to add geospatial imaging software to the CCL because of a commodity jurisdiction or classification request was instructive as to the reason to deviate from the prescribed procedure for emerging technology in the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECR). Per the statute, export controls through the EAR on emerging technology, which would include this software because of the involvement of artificial intelligence, must be first issued by a proposed rule. However, because the software, although technically emerging technology, was  flagged through a commodity jurisdiction or classification request, a proposed rule was not necessary and the interim final rule could be directly issued. It should also be noted that emerging technology, as contemplated under the ECR, is a notional list indicating areas of focus for the Department of Commerce, which will periodically issue notices to implement controls on emerging technology as it defines control parameters.

Based on the overall context of controls on emerging technology, it is likely the action was undertaken in consideration of the US government’s national security concerns raised by China’s developments and advancement in emerging technologies and their potential military application. As of now, the new controls only apply to software, not to technology. Accordingly, to the extent a company releases technology to develop the 0D521 software, the technology is not controlled by the January 6 rule and the changes to the CCL have no impact on its development or release of such technology.

Impact

We continually monitor the developments with respect to the export controls reform, particularly pertaining to emerging technology controls. These changes should be of particular interest to companies with non-US ownership, and export controls professionals within these companies need to quickly gain an understanding of the impact that Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) has on how the US government regulates critical technology, which includes emerging technology, as well as how certain changes in ownership may now trigger a mandatory filing with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

© Copyright 2020 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

We employ a comprehensive approach when it comes to our International Trade practice. We focus on global import and export compliance, international trade policy and market access and trade remedies/defense. Our lawyers practice international trade law in almost every country where we have an office, and our full-time practitioners operate out of our Washington DC, London and Brussels offices.

We offer a “one-stop” service encompassing international trade compliance and policy acumen to make necessary judgments while operating effectively in a...

202-626-6234