June 13, 2021

Volume XI, Number 164

Advertisement

June 11, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

California Federal Court Approves FCRA Class Action Settlement

The Eastern District of California recently approved a $1.375 million settlement between a certified class of former employee plaintiffs and an employer defendant.  The class consisted of all individuals who worked for the defendant between March 30, 2013 and May 1, 2018.  The defendant was alleged to have misused FCRA consent forms to improperly run background checks, along with a series of wage and hour violations under California law.

In Carrasco v. Romanoff Floor Covering, Inc., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84502 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2021), the court granted final approval over the above-referenced settlement.  Per the preliminary settlement approval, set out in Bailey v. Romanoff Floor Covering, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125694, at *3 (E.D. Cal. July 15, 2020), the 2,989-member FCRA class received 30% of the net settlement amount, and the 702-member California class asserting wage and hour claims received 70% of the net settlement amount.  Administrative costs and attorney fees amounted to $388,750, reducing the net settlement to $986,250.  Ultimately, the FCRA settlement netted each class member approximately $99, and the wage and hour settlement netted each class member approximately $983.

Relatively speaking, the FCRA settlement was significantly smaller than the class’s wage and hour settlement, but did allow the class to litigate in federal court and benefit from federal class certification procedures under Rule 23.  FCRA defendants should be on the lookout for efforts to bootstrap federal consumer privacy statutes to largely state-law claims to obtain federal jurisdiction, and think creatively about ways to ensure litigation occurs in their preferred venue.

© Copyright 2021 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 133
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jesse Taylor Associate  Columbus complex contract, franchise law, qui tam litigation
Associate

Jesse Taylor practices in state and federal court, with experience in complex contract and franchise law and qui tam litigation.

Prior to joining Squire Patton Boggs, he worked as a litigation associate in another top 20 international law firm. Previously, Jesse served as a law clerk to the Honorable Judith E. Levy, US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, and to the Honorable James G. Carr, US District Court, Northern District of Ohio. In addition to his law firm experience and clerkships, Jesse worked as the online communications director for the Office of the...

614-365-2714
Advertisement
Advertisement